184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11838315)
1. Thin-layer Pap test vs. conventional Pap smear. Analysis of 400 split samples.
Biscotti CV; O'Brien DL; Gero MA; Gramlich TL; Kennedy AW; Easley KA
J Reprod Med; 2002 Jan; 47(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11838315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of liquid-based Pap tests: comparison of concurrent liquid-based tests and cervical biopsies on 782 women with previously abnormal Pap smears.
Guo M; Hu L; Martin L; Liu S; Baliga M; Hughson MD
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 15839615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver variability: comparison between liquid-based and conventional preparations in gynecologic cytology.
Chhieng DC; Talley LI; Roberson J; Gatscha RM; Jhala NC; Elgert PA
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 96(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 11954023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population.
Cheung AN; Szeto EF; Leung BS; Khoo US; Ng AW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 14681939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases.
Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N
Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?
Malik SN; Wilkinson EJ; Drew PA; Bennett BB; Hardt NS
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):376-80. PubMed ID: 10349365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Split-sample analysis of discarded cells from liquid-based Pap smear sampling devices.
Rinas AC; Mittman BW; Le LV; Hartmann K; Cayless J; Singh HK
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 16514841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the Thin Prep Pap Test in clinical practice.
Guidos BJ; Selvaggi SM
Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Feb; 20(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 9951600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of a liquid-based thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer.
Weintraub J; Morabia A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jan; 22(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10613975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality metrics in cervical cytopathology: A single institutional study.
Senthil Kumar D; Ravikumar G
Cytopathology; 2022 Mar; 33(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 34854153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional and liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: a comparison study with clinical and histologic follow-up.
Baker JJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 12203869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a laboratory audit of cervical reporting.
Roche DH; Spicer N
N Z Med J; 2001 Feb; 114(1126):64-6. PubMed ID: 11280428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the interval between papanicolaou tests influence the quality of cytology?
Jeronimo J; Khan MJ; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Cancer; 2005 Jun; 105(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 15822121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two tests for detecting carcinogenic HPV in women with Papanicolaou smear reports of ASCUS and LSIL.
Ferris DG; Wright TC; Litaker MS; Richart RM; Lorincz AT; Sun XW; Woodward L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Feb; 46(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9487319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
