These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11838486)
1. Australia stops short of a ban on therapeutic cloning. Nowak R New Sci; 2001 Sep; 171(2310):11. PubMed ID: 11838486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. European perspectives on therapeutic cloning. Evers K N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1579-82. PubMed ID: 11994550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. House backs ban on human cloning for any objective. Stolberg SG N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 12154827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee. Brownsword R Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Stem cell studies advance in Britain. Wade N N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 12155135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Expert group to look at UK cloning law. Masood E Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientists react to government indecision. Brown P Nat Med; 1999 Aug; 5(8):855-6. PubMed ID: 10426295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Japan. Human cloning ban allows some research. Normile D Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1872. PubMed ID: 11187037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The status of the embryo and policy discourse. Cahill LS J Med Philos; 1997 Oct; 22(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 9360194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. House of Lords rejects challenge to therapeutic cloning. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(2):23. PubMed ID: 14964208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Allow cloning in embryo research, says UK report. Loder N Nature; 1998 Dec; 396(6711):503. PubMed ID: 9859974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cloning and stem cells--handicapping the political and scientific debates. Daley GQ N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(3):211-2. PubMed ID: 12867604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rules due on disputed embryo research. Angier N N Y Times Web; 1994 Sep; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11647977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Japan's cloning ban will allow stem cell experiments. Triendl R Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6776):321. PubMed ID: 10766599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Great expectations. Coghlan A; Young E New Sci; 2001 Jan; 169(2272):9. PubMed ID: 15366156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Stem cells--scientific, medical, and political issues. Weissman IL N Engl J Med; 2002 May; 346(20):1576-9. PubMed ID: 11994551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Public consultation on human cloning launched. Bower H BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):411. PubMed ID: 9492655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research. Ethics Committee of the Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2004 Mar; 14(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 15250114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should a ban on reproductive cloning include a ban on cloning for purposes of research or therapy? Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 2001-2002; 32(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 12645553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]