These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11838511)

  • 1. A shooting on Capitol Hill: "The Ruby Satellite System," mental illness, and failure of the American legal system.
    Cohen PJ
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2001 Dec; 11(4):391-400. PubMed ID: 11838511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond.
    Floyd J
    Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
    Latzer B
    Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
    Davoli JI
    Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
    Sindel PE
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1991; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
    Malmquist CP
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Madness on trial.
    Cornwall J
    New Sci; 2003 Mar; 177(2386):27. PubMed ID: 14587492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to "just say no": a history and analysis of the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cichon DE
    LA Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 53(2):283-426. PubMed ID: 11657118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sell v. United States: the appropriate standard for involuntarily administering antipsychotic drugs to dangerous detainees for trial.
    Borger BA
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2005; 35(3):1099-120. PubMed ID: 16270457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Major tranquilizers in prison: drug therapy and the unconsenting inmate.
    Sitnick SA
    Willamette Law J; 1975; 11(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 11664569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs.
    Brooks WM
    Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
    Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
    Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In re Woodall.
    California. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4
    Wests Calif Report; 1989 Apr; 257():601-10. PubMed ID: 11648573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations on the Mental Health Act 1983.
    Hamilton JR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(3-4):371-80. PubMed ID: 11658608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. United States v. Charters.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1987 Sep; 829():479-500. PubMed ID: 11648561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.