These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11839411)
1. Improved method for determining resolution zones in ultrasound phantoms with spherical simulated lesions. Kofler JM; Madsen EL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Dec; 27(12):1667-76. PubMed ID: 11839411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phantoms and automated system for testing the resolution of ultrasound scanners. Rownd JJ; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Frank GR; Dong F Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 9140182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association of automated and human observer lesion detecting ability using phantoms. Kofler JM; Lindstrom MJ; Kelcz F; Madsen EL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15749558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound focal lesion detectability phantoms. Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Macdonald MC; Frank GR Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1171-80. PubMed ID: 1753901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a focal lesion phantom with clinically relevant lesion characteristics for image quality evaluation of breast ultrasound scanners. Browne JE; Cannon LM; Fagan AJ; Cournane S Phys Med; 2022 Feb; 94():65-74. PubMed ID: 34998134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small lesion detection with resolution enhancement compression. Linden P; Sanchez JR; Oelze ML Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 20690429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the performance of ultrasound imaging systems using images from relatively high-density random spherical void phantoms: A simulation study. Holland MR Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):878-890. PubMed ID: 34894402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MO-D-218-02: Ultrasound Phantoms in Image Quality Measurements and Performance Assessment. Madsen E Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3870. PubMed ID: 28518253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decorrelated compounding improves lesion signal-to-noise ratio of low-contrast lesions in synthetic transmit aperture ultrasound imaging. Zhao N; Xu Y JASA Express Lett; 2022 Feb; 2(2):022001. PubMed ID: 36154260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spherical lesion phantoms for testing the performance of elastography systems. Madsen EL; Frank GR; Hobson MA; Shi H; Jiang J; Varghese T; Hall TJ Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5983-95. PubMed ID: 16333168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance testing of transrectal US scanners. Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Medina IR; Frank GR Radiology; 1994 Jan; 190(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8259432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Generalized Contrast-to-Noise Ratio: A Formal Definition for Lesion Detectability. Rodriguez-Molares A; Rindal OMH; D'hooge J; Masoy SE; Austeng A; Lediju Bell MA; Torp H IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Apr; 67(4):745-759. PubMed ID: 31796398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Localization of spherical lesions in tumor-mimicking phantoms by 3D sparse array photoacoustic imaging. Ephrat P; Albert GC; Roumeliotis MB; Belton M; Prato FS; Carson JJ Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1619-28. PubMed ID: 20443483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simulated lesion, human observer performance comparison between thin-section dedicated breast CT images versus computed thick-section simulated projection images of the breast. Chen L; Boone JM; Abbey CK; Hargreaves J; Bateni C; Lindfors KK; Yang K; Nosratieh A; Hernandez A; Gazi P Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3347-58. PubMed ID: 25825980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ga-67 scintigraphic imaging: role of combined optimized energy photopeaks and scatter correction in improving lesion detectability. Ali L; Khalil M; Muddei S; Burezq S; Al-Hajri B Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Aug; 32(8):724-30. PubMed ID: 21597393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual-search observers for assessing tomographic x-ray image quality. Gifford HC; Liang Z; Das M Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1563-75. PubMed ID: 26936739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a novel collimator for molecular breast tomosynthesis. Gilland DR; Welch BL; Lee S; Kross B; Weisenberger AG Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5740-5748. PubMed ID: 28877351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. Timberg P; Båth M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5618-26. PubMed ID: 21158273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]