These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11839844)

  • 1. A videotaped CIBIC for dementia patients: validity and reliability in a simulated clinical trial.
    Quinn J; Moore M; Benson DF; Clark CM; Doody R; Jagust W; Knopman D; Kaye JA
    Neurology; 2002 Feb; 58(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 11839844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability study on the Japanese version of the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change.
    Homma A; Nakamura Y; Kobune S; Haraguchi H; Kodani N; Takami I; Matsuoka J; Matsuda H; Kusunoki T
    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord; 2006; 21(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16352896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and reliability of the Polish version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).
    Rzewuska M
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2002; 11(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 12459802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial.
    Goldstein LB; Samsa GP
    Stroke; 1997 Feb; 28(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 9040680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical dementia rating training and reliability in multicenter studies: the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study experience.
    Morris JC; Ernesto C; Schafer K; Coats M; Leon S; Sano M; Thal LJ; Woodbury P
    Neurology; 1997 Jun; 48(6):1508-10. PubMed ID: 9191756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of the Perceive, Recall, Plan, and Perform (PRPP) assessment in community-dwelling dementia patients: test consistency and inter-rater agreement.
    Steultjens EM; Voigt-Radloff S; Leonhart R; Graff MJ
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2012 Apr; 24(4):659-65. PubMed ID: 22166513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Norwegian version of the rating anxiety in dementia scale (RAID-N): a validity and reliability study.
    Goyal AR; Bergh S; Engedal K; Kirkevold M; Kirkevold Ø
    Aging Ment Health; 2017 Dec; 21(12):1256-1261. PubMed ID: 27584559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The inter-rater reliability of the MINI-Plus].
    Zandee ME; de Jong K
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2018; 60(10):693-698. PubMed ID: 30328595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sources of unreliability in depression ratings.
    Kobak KA; Brown B; Sharp I; Levy-Mack H; Wells K; Ockun F; Williams JB
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Feb; 29(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 19142114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.
    Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Hendry A; Potter J; Bone I; Muir KW
    Stroke; 2005 Apr; 36(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 15718510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of post-mortem chart diagnoses of schizophrenia and dementia.
    Keilp JG; Waniek C; Goldman RG; Zemishlany Z; Alexander GE; Gibbon M; Wu A; Susser E; Prohovnik I
    Schizophr Res; 1995 Oct; 17(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 8562497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral evaluation of Alzheimer disease in clinical trials: development of the Japanese version of the GBS Scale.
    Homma A; Niina R; Ishii T; Hasegawa K
    Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1991; 5 Suppl 1():S40-8. PubMed ID: 1781973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability study on the Japanese version of the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change. Analysis of subscale items and 'clinician's impression'.
    Nakamura Y; Homma A; Kobune S; Tachibana Y; Satoh K; Takami I; Nagai S; Sakai M; Fukuta H; Matsuda H; Hashimoto H; Kusunoki T;
    Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord; 2007; 23(2):104-15. PubMed ID: 17135727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-rater reliability of ratings on the six-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-6) obtained using the Simplified Negative and Positive Symptoms Interview (SNAPSI).
    Kølbæk P; Blicher AB; Buus CW; Feller SG; Holm T; Dines D; O'Leary KM; Sørensen RS; Opler M; Correll CU; Mors O; Bech P; Østergaard SD
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2018 Aug; 72(6):431-436. PubMed ID: 30037286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The reliability of the Developmental Profile based on video ratings.
    Scholte WR; Tiemens BG; Verheul R; Meerman A; Hutschemaekers G
    Bull Menninger Clin; 2009; 73(3):226-38. PubMed ID: 19807225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and validity of a rating scale for post-stroke psychiatric symptoms. SKETCH Study Group.
    Homma A; Kusunoki T; Shimasaki S; Urata M; Ishino N; Sawada T; Hirai S
    Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1999; 13 Suppl 3():S148-58. PubMed ID: 10609695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinician and caregiver agreement on neuropsychiatric symptom severity: a study using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Clinician rating scale (NPI-C).
    Zaidi S; Kat MG; de Jonghe JF
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1139-45. PubMed ID: 24622334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The role of observer for the reliability of Dutch version of the Discomfort Scale-Dementia of Alzheimer Type (DS-DAT)].
    Hoogendoorn LI; Kamp S; Mahomed CA; Adèr HJ; Ooms ME; van der Steen JT
    Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2001 Jun; 32(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 11455871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size requirements for training to a kappa agreement criterion on clinical dementia ratings.
    Tractenberg RE; Yumoto F; Jin S; Morris JC
    Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 2010; 24(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 20473138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-rater reliability of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX): comparative data from non-clinician respondents-all raters are not equal.
    Barker LA; Morton N; Morrison TG; McGuire BE
    Brain Inj; 2011; 25(10):997-1004. PubMed ID: 21749190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.