These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11840846)

  • 1. Which rules-state law or ERISA? Patients' rights case before high court could have big impact on HMO enrollees.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Jan; 32(3):16. PubMed ID: 11840846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERISA preemption conflict in the Third Circuit.
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Dec; ():8-11. PubMed ID: 12596431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High court upholds independent physician reviews under state law.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Jul; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12420399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Managed care. New call for patients' bill of rights. Docs worry ruling limiting HMO suits will boost medical malpractice filings.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2004 Jun; 34(26):12. PubMed ID: 15242105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERISA pre-empts patient's negligence claim against HMO.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1651-3. PubMed ID: 14719763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HMOS--independent medical review--preemption. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran.
    Benefits Q; 2003; 19(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 12827843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of the recent Supreme Court rulings in Pegram and Rush Prudential on state regulation of managed care organizations.
    Trueman DL
    J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):107-32. PubMed ID: 12784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should your ERISA remedy depend upon your geography?: an analysis of Rush Prudential HMO, INC. v. Moran.
    Schulz AM
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):553-71. PubMed ID: 14748257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High court rules ERISA pre-empts negligence claims against HMOs.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Oct; 135(10):1480-2. PubMed ID: 15551991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERISA: no preemption of state's HMO law requiring independent physician review.
    Sapeika T
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 11317432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court's pre-emptive strike against patients' rights to sue their HMOs.
    Kopels S; Manselle T
    Soc Work Health Care; 2006; 43(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 16723332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERISA: U.S. Supreme Court holds treatment decisions made by HMO physician-employees do not breach fiduciary duty.
    Netter W
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 11210385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The changing world of HMO liability under ERISA.
    McAuliffe BE
    J Leg Med; 2001 Mar; 22(1):77-106. PubMed ID: 11330125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HMOs, accountability, and the death of ERISA preemption.
    Zaremski MJ
    J Leg Med; 2002 Dec; 23(4):547-62. PubMed ID: 12495544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ERISA roadblock.
    Borges W
    Tex Med; 2004 Aug; 100(8):31-3. PubMed ID: 15386976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERISA preemption remains on the front burner.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2004 Mar; 21(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 15011608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. Supreme Court rules on physicians' role under ERISA group health plans.
    Meadors GM
    J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(3):146-7. PubMed ID: 11280204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A review of the argument in favor of state law remedies under the patients' bill of rights.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Sep; ():3-10. PubMed ID: 12420390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Any Willing Provider" laws not preempted by Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. et. al. v. Miller, Commissioner, Kentucky Department of Insurance.
    Benefits Q; 2004; 20(3):69-70. PubMed ID: 15453199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERISA and RICO: new tools for HMO litigators.
    Moore ET
    J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 11067638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.