125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11843067)
1. Crossover is not a consequence of neglect: a test of the orientation/estimation hypothesis.
Mennemeier M; Vezey E; Lamar M; Jewell G
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2002 Jan; 8(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 11843067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.
Mennemeier M; Pierce CA; Chatterjee A; Anderson B; Jewell G; Dowler R; Woods AJ; Glenn T; Mark VW
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1194-211. PubMed ID: 16197678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements.
Doricchi F; Guariglia P; Figliozzi F; Silvetti M; Bruno G; Gasparini M
Brain; 2005 Jun; 128(Pt 6):1386-406. PubMed ID: 15758037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rightward and leftward bisection biases in spatial neglect: two sides of the same coin?
Savazzi S; Posteraro L; Veronesi G; Mancini F
Brain; 2007 Aug; 130(Pt 8):2070-84. PubMed ID: 17584772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Context effects in pseudo-neglect measured with a free vision Landmark task.
Rueckert L; McFadden HG
Laterality; 2004 Oct; 9(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 15513239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect.
Malhotra P; Jäger HR; Parton A; Greenwood R; Playford ED; Brown MM; Driver J; Husain M
Brain; 2005 Feb; 128(Pt 2):424-35. PubMed ID: 15644422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: evidence from neglect.
Zorzi M; Priftis K; Meneghello F; Marenzi R; Umiltà C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1061-7. PubMed ID: 16356515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive correlation in the bisection of long and short horizontal Oppel-Kundt illusory gradients: Implications for the interpretation of the "cross-over" effect in spatial neglect.
Binetti N; Aiello M; Merola S; Bruschini M; Lecce F; Macci E; Doricchi F
Cortex; 2011 May; 47(5):608-16. PubMed ID: 20926070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Representational neglect for words as revealed by bisection tasks.
Arduino LS; Marinelli CV; Pasotti F; Ferrè ER; Bottini G
J Neuropsychol; 2012 Mar; 6(1):43-64. PubMed ID: 22257574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The psychophysical power law and unilateral spatial neglect.
Chatterjee A; Mennemeier M; Heilman KM
Brain Cogn; 1994 May; 25(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 8043269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Character-line Bisection Task: a new test for hemispatial neglect.
Lee BH; Kang SJ; Park JM; Son Y; Lee KH; Adair JC; Heilman KM; Na DL
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(12):1715-24. PubMed ID: 15327939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect.
Shimozaki S; Kingstone A; Olk B; Stowe R; Eckstein M
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is judgement of line orientation selectively impaired in right brain damaged patients?
Treccani B; Torri T; Cubelli R
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 15716150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissecting the component deficits of perceptual imbalance in visual neglect: evidence from horizontal-vertical length comparisons.
Charras P; Lupiáñez J; Migliaccio R; Toba M; Pradat-Diehl P; Duret C; Bartolomeo P
Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):540-52. PubMed ID: 21371700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Disturbed line bisection is associated with posterior brain lesions.
Rorden C; Fruhmann Berger M; Karnath HO
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 16519881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crossover by line length and spatial location.
Mennemeier M; Rapcsak SZ; Pierce C; Vezey E
Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 11748897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right.
Urbanski M; Bartolomeo P
Cortex; 2008; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weights and measures: a new look at bisection behaviour in neglect.
McIntosh RD; Schindler I; Birchall D; Milner AD
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):833-50. PubMed ID: 16275042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The vertical-horizontal illusion in hemi-spatial neglect.
de Montalembert M; Mamassian P
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3245-51. PubMed ID: 20624409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
