198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11843524)
1. Long-term outcomes with mechanical and tissue valves.
Khan S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 11843524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-center outcome analysis of 1,161 patients with St. Jude medical and ATS open pivot mechanical heart valves.
Bernet FH; Baykut D; Grize L; Zerkowski HR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Mar; 16(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 17484464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.
Stassano P; Di Tommaso L; Monaco M; Iorio F; Pepino P; Spampinato N; Vosa C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic valves or tissue valves--a vote for mechanical prostheses.
Horstkotte D
Z Kardiol; 1985; 74 Suppl 6():19-37. PubMed ID: 4096074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The best of valvular heart disease in 2006].
de Gevigney G;
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2007 Jan; 100 Spec No 1():19-28. PubMed ID: 17405561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacement in infants and children.
Sachweh JS; Tiete AR; Mühler EG; Groetzner J; Gulbins H; Messmer BJ; Daebritz SH
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 55(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 17410500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation of the carbomedics prosthesis: experience at providence health system in Portland.
Minakata K; Wu Y; Zerr KJ; Grunkemeier GL; Handy JR; Ahmad A; Starr A; Furnary AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 12479287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical valves versus the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement in children: propensity-adjusted comparison of long-term outcomes.
Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Al-Ahmadi M; Sallehuddin A; Canver CC; Bulbul Z; Joufan M; Fadel B
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 137(2):362-370.e9. PubMed ID: 19185153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; Jones DJ; Nicoloff DM; Blake DP; Arom KV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current heart valve prostheses.
Lefrak EA; Starr A
Am Fam Physician; 1979 Sep; 20(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 474371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ten-year outcome with the sorin bicarbon and Baxter Mira bileaflet prostheses in the aortic position.
Vitale N; de Feo M; Renzulli A; Gregorio R; Cappabianca G; Onorati F; de Luca L; Schinosa T; Cotrufo M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jul; 13(4):632-7. PubMed ID: 15311871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.
Prasongsukarn K; Jamieson WR; Lichtenstein SV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):501-8, 510-1; discussion 509. PubMed ID: 16116877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of mitral valve replacement: biological xenograft versus mechanical valves.
Yao H; Miyamoto T; Mukai S; Yamamura M; Tanaka H; Nakagawa T; Ryomoto M; Inai Y; Yoshioka Y; Kaji M
J Artif Organs; 2003; 6(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 14598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
