These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11844028)

  • 1. Relation between cavity design and marginal adaptation in a machine-milled ceramic restorative system.
    Sato K; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 29(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 11844028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems.
    Soares CJ; Martins LR; Fernandes Neto AJ; Giannini M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):689-94. PubMed ID: 14653281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Saller A
    J Dent; 1996; 24(1-2):25-31. PubMed ID: 8636488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
    Rechenberg DK; Göhring TN; Attin T
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
    Chang JC; Hart DA; Estey AW; Chan JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay.
    Schmalz G; Federlin M; Reich E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 7783020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microtensile bond strength to dentin and cavity adaptation of Cerec 2 inlay restoration.
    Uno S; Tanaka T; Kawamoto C; Konishi J; Sano H
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 11764827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    J Dent; 1993 Feb; 21(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 8425982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro.
    Krifka S; Anthofer T; Fritzsch M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G; Federlin M
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 19192835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
    Otto T; Schneider D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo.
    Van Meerbeek B; Inokoshi S; Willems G; Noack MJ; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Roulet JF; Vanherle G
    J Dent; 1992 Feb; 20(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 1548381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems.
    Sertgöz A; Gemalmaz D; Alkumru H; Yoruç B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Jun; 3(4):151-4. PubMed ID: 8601157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements.
    Mota CS; Demarco FF; Camacho GB; Powers JM
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 12729085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.