These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11845164)
21. Biodefence plans earn lukewarm response from US academics. Check E Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):245-6. PubMed ID: 12646880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Science feels the pinch as Bush budget targets defence. Check E Nature; 2003 Feb; 421(6923):565. PubMed ID: 12571560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. War of words deepens divide over biodefence funds. Marris E Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):813. PubMed ID: 15829930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. DNA committee is model for bioterrorism debate. Perpich JG Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6915):462. PubMed ID: 12466817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review. Couzin J Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomedical research--an integral component of national security. Hirschberg R; La Montagne J; Fauci AS N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(21):2119-21. PubMed ID: 15152055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Funding agendas: has bioterror defense been over-prioritized? May T Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(4):34-44. PubMed ID: 16109694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientists placated as US bill gets tough on bioterror. Gewin V Nature; 2002 May; 417(6888):475. PubMed ID: 12037529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Bioterrorism. New law may force labs to screen workers. Malakoff D; Enserink M Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5544):971-3. PubMed ID: 11691958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]