These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11845759)

  • 41. Continence. Pad use in perspective.
    McKibben E
    Nurs Times; 1995 Jun 14-20; 91(24):60-2. PubMed ID: 7617488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Development and psychometric evaluation of ICIQ-PadPROM: A quality of life questionnaire to assess the treatment effect of absorbent continence products.
    Yearwood Martin C; Murphy C; Cotterill N; Williams S; Cottenden A; Fader M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Jun; 37(5):1650-1657. PubMed ID: 29675908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Choosing continence products for children.
    Sanders C
    Nurs Stand; 2002 Apr 24-30; 16(32):39-43. PubMed ID: 12017074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Where Do Women With Urinary Incontinence Find Information About Absorbent Products and How Useful Do They Find It?
    Smith N; Hunter KF; Rajabali S; Milsom I; Wagg A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2019; 46(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 30531409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Products for comfort].
    Allias B
    Soins; 1992 Mar; (558):36-8. PubMed ID: 1594957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A pilot study to evaluate reusable absorbent body-worn products for adults with moderate/heavy urinary incontinence.
    Macaulay M; Clarke-O'Neill S; Fader M; Pettersson L; Cottenden A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2004; 31(6):357-66. PubMed ID: 15867711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A randomized, controlled trial comparing skin health effects and comfort of two adult incontinence protective underwear.
    Trowbridge MM; Wang B; Gutshall D; Rodenberg CA; Farage MA
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 May; 23(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 27500487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A randomized controlled trial of the NEAT expandable tip continence device.
    Robinson H; Schulz J; Flood C; Hansen L
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2003 Aug; 14(3):199-203; discussion 203. PubMed ID: 12955343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Incontinence pads: recommending the best product-based wetback performance and price.
    Erekson EA; Meyer SA; Melick C; McLennan MT
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1411-4. PubMed ID: 18506382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The 24-hour pad test in continent women and men: normal values and cyclical alterations.
    Karantanis E; O'Sullivan R; Moore KH
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):567-71. PubMed ID: 12798473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Absorbent products for containing urinary and/or fecal incontinence in adults.
    Brazzelli M; Shirran E; Vale L
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2002 Jan; 29(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 11810074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Improving the performance of small incontinence pads: a study of "wet comfort".
    Thornburn P; Fader M; Dean G; Brooks R; Cottenden A
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1997 Jul; 24(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 9274279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Treatment not pads.
    Sprinks J
    Nurs Stand; 2013 May 8-14; 27(36):23. PubMed ID: 23821987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with a new anatomically shaped vaginal device (Conveen Continence Guard).
    Hahn I; Milsom I
    Br J Urol; 1996 May; 77(5):711-5. PubMed ID: 8689116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Continence. Delivering the best service.
    Pyne K; Stott M
    Nurs Times; 1996 Apr 10-16; 92(15):60-2. PubMed ID: 8710581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating bodyworn continence pads.
    Mackin B
    Nurs Stand; 1990 Jan 31-Feb 6; 4(19):36-9. PubMed ID: 2107433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors influencing intact skin in women with incontinence using absorbent products: results of a cross-sectional, comparative study.
    Shigeta Y; Nakagami G; Sanada H; Konya C; Sugama J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2010 Dec; 56(12):26-8, 30-3. PubMed ID: 21205991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Patient satisfaction with a reusable undergarment for urinary incontinence.
    Gallo M; Staskin DR
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1997 Jul; 24(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 9274280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pad count is a poor measure of the severity of urinary incontinence.
    Tsui JF; Shah MB; Weinberger JM; Ghanaat M; Weiss JP; Purohit RS; Blaivas JG
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1787-90. PubMed ID: 23727311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Significance of pad test loss for the evaluation of women with urinary incontinence.
    Paick JS; Ku JH; Shin JW; Park K; Son H; Oh SJ; Kim SW
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15468291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.