These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11845788)

  • 1. [Esthetics of face; development of a scale for the measurement of facial esthetics].
    Peerlings RH; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Hoeksma JB
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Feb; 99(2):60-2. PubMed ID: 11845788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A photographic scale to measure facial aesthetics.
    Peerlings RH; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Hoeksma JB
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Apr; 17(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7781718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inability to relate tooth forms to face shape and gender.
    Wolfart S; Menzel H; Kern M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2004 Dec; 112(6):471-6. PubMed ID: 15560828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Q-sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S61-71. PubMed ID: 19362268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces.
    Kiekens RM; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maltha JC
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 17290021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the relationship between subjects' perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs.
    Tortopidis D; Hatzikyriakos A; Kokoti M; Menexes G; Tsiggos N
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(3):154-62; discussion 163. PubMed ID: 17518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Hönekopp J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16634665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations.
    Quinn JV; Drzewiecki AE; Stiell IG; Elmslie TJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Mar; 13(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 7893315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An orthodontic view of dentofacial esthetics.
    Morris W
    Compendium; 1994 Mar; 15(3):378, 380-2, 384 passim; quiz 390. PubMed ID: 8205591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.
    Gehrke P; Lobert M; Dhom G
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(6):375-84; discussion 385. PubMed ID: 19120783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness.
    Edler R; Agarwal P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Jun; 28(3):274-81. PubMed ID: 16415084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.