These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11845788)

  • 21. Exposure to 'ideal' facial images reduces facial satisfaction: an experimental study.
    Newton JT; Minhas G
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 33(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 16262608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can we justify a global model of facial attractiveness and beauty?
    Abdel-Kader HM
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 May; 22(1):71-2. PubMed ID: 16792249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.
    Cardash HS; Ormanier Z; Laufer BZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rating of facial attractiveness.
    Phillips C; Tulloch C; Dann C
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 20(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1526107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Subjective vs objective evaluations of smile esthetics.
    Schabel BJ; Franchi L; Baccetti T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S72-9. PubMed ID: 19362269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The aesthetic unit principle of facial aging.
    Tan SL; Brandt MG; Yeung JC; Doyle PC; Moore CC
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25411772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The enigma of facial beauty: esthetics, proportions, deformity, and controversy.
    Naini FB; Moss JP; Gill DS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 16979484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study.
    Tatarunaite E; Playle R; Hood K; Shaw W; Richmond S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):676-82; quiz 755. PubMed ID: 15953892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 16009665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-based evaluation of gender identification and morphologic classification of tooth face and arch forms.
    Berksun S; Hasanreisoğlu U; Gökdeniz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 12488849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of the validity and reliability of the University of Wisconsin Children's Hospital Pain scale for Preverbal and Nonverbal Children.
    Soetenga D; Frank J; Pellino TA
    Pediatr Nurs; 1999; 25(6):670-6. PubMed ID: 12024390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11-14 year olds sensitive to clinical and self-perceived variations in orthodontic status?
    Locker D; Jokovic A; Tompson B; Prakash P
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 17518964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP Child's version).
    Broder HL; Wilson-Genderson M
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 35 Suppl 1():20-31. PubMed ID: 17615047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of facial esthetics by a panel of professionals and a lay panel.
    Ousehal L; Lazrak L; Serrhini I; Elquars F
    Int Orthod; 2011 Jun; 9(2):224-34. PubMed ID: 21498140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A photographic scale for the evaluation of facial skin aging in Indian women.
    Bernois A; Huber A; Derome C; Drouault Y; de Quéral D; Schnebert S; Perrier E; Heusèle C
    Eur J Dermatol; 2011; 21(5):700-4. PubMed ID: 21719407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Arthroscopic assessment of cartilage repair: a validation study of 2 scoring systems.
    Smith GD; Taylor J; Almqvist KF; Erggelet C; Knutsen G; Garcia Portabella M; Smith T; Richardson JB
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Dec; 21(12):1462-7. PubMed ID: 16376236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.