These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11846315)

  • 1. Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform.
    Mowrey KA; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov R
    Europace; 2002 Jan; 4(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 11846315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure.
    Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev T; Tchou PJ
    Circ Res; 1998 May; 82(8):918-25. PubMed ID: 9576111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation.
    Walcott GP; Walker RG; Cates AW; Krassowska W; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1995 Sep; 6(9):737-50. PubMed ID: 8556194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct measurements of membrane time constant during defibrillation strength shocks.
    Sharma V; Qu F; Nikolski VP; DeGroot P; Efimov IR
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Apr; 4(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 17399638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct evidence of the role of virtual electrode-induced phase singularity in success and failure of defibrillation.
    Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Yamanouchi Y; Tchou PJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Aug; 11(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 10969748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Gurvich waveform has lower defibrillation threshold than the rectilinear waveform and the truncated exponential waveform in the rabbit heart.
    Qu F; Zarubin F; Wollenzier B; Nikolski VP; Efimov IR
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2005 Feb; 83(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 15791288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode.
    Efimov IR; Cheng YN; Biermann M; Van Wagoner DR; Mazgalev TN; Tchou PJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):1031-45. PubMed ID: 9300301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.
    Kroll MW; Swerdlow CD
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2007 Apr; 18(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 17541815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Membrane time constant during internal defibrillation strength shocks in intact heart: effects of Na+ and Ca2+ channel blockers.
    Mowrey KA; Efimov IR; Cheng Y
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 20(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 18775052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric practice: a single-centre UK experience with focus on subcutaneous defibrillation.
    Griksaitis MJ; Rosengarten JA; Gnanapragasam JP; Haw MP; Morgan JM
    Europace; 2013 Apr; 15(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 23333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual electrode effects in transvenous defibrillation-modulation by structure and interface: evidence from bidomain simulations and optical mapping.
    Entcheva E; Eason J; Efimov IR; Cheng Y; Malkin R; Claydon F
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 9(9):949-61. PubMed ID: 9786075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Virtual electrode polarization in the far field: implications for external defibrillation.
    Efimov IR; Aguel F; Cheng Y; Wollenzier B; Trayanova N
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2000 Sep; 279(3):H1055-70. PubMed ID: 10993768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of tuned waveforms based on different membrane time constants on defibrillation thresholds: primary results from the POWER trial.
    Doshi SK; Pittaro MD; Reeves R; Boyce K; Payne JP; Kroll MW; Graumann RJ; Oza AL; Val-Mejias JE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Oct; 35(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 22906140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated external defibrillators: design considerations.
    Kroll MW; Brewer JE
    New Horiz; 1997 May; 5(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 9153042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk stratification for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy: the role of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator.
    Klein HU; Goldenberg I; Moss AJ
    Eur Heart J; 2013 Aug; 34(29):2230-42. PubMed ID: 23729691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks.
    Clark DM; Pollard AE; Ideker RE; Knisley SB
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 10387137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate termination of fibrillation at 50% probability of overall success correlates with defibrillation dose-response curve width.
    Tovar OH; Snyder DE; Jones JL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 15(10):1207-11. PubMed ID: 15485449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic defibrillation waveforms in an isolated rabbit heart preparation.
    Holley LK; McCulloch RM
    Cardiovasc Res; 1991 Dec; 25(12):979-83. PubMed ID: 1806236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Virtual electrode-induced reexcitation: A mechanism of defibrillation.
    Cheng Y; Mowrey KA; Van Wagoner DR; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
    Circ Res; 1999 Nov; 85(11):1056-66. PubMed ID: 10571537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.