These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11846315)

  • 21. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tetanizing prepulse: A novel strategy to mitigate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock-related pain.
    Hunter DW; Tandri H; Halperin H; Tung L; Berger RD
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 May; 13(5):1142-1148. PubMed ID: 26767423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Synchronized repolarization after defibrillation shocks. A possible component of the defibrillation process demonstrated by optical recordings in rabbit heart.
    Dillon SM
    Circulation; 1992 May; 85(5):1865-78. PubMed ID: 1572042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity.
    Yamanouchi Y; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR
    Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 79(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11201498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intracardiac atrial defibrillation.
    Dosdall DJ; Ideker RE
    Heart Rhythm; 2007 Mar; 4(3 Suppl):S51-6. PubMed ID: 17336885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acute defibrillation performance of a novel, non-transvenous shock pathway in adult ICD indicated patients.
    Lieberman R; Havel WJ; Rashba E; DeGroot PJ; Stromberg K; Shorofsky SR
    Heart Rhythm; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 18053770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Numerical Evaluation of Multi-Lead Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for Low Energy and Less Damage in Swine
    Lai D; Fan X; Chen Q
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4889-4892. PubMed ID: 31946956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks, waveform rounding, and synchronized shock delivery.
    Kidwai BJ; McIntyre A; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    J Electrocardiol; 2002 Jul; 35(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 12122614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vector magnitude using orthogonal ECG leads during ventricular fibrillation is associated with defibrillation outcome.
    Gurunathan S; Hsia PW; Lawton J; Hua DP
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1998; 32(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9475962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Success and failure of biphasic shocks: results of bidomain simulations.
    Anderson C; Trayanova NA
    Math Biosci; 2001 Dec; 174(2):91-109. PubMed ID: 11730859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multicenter study of shock pathways for subcutaneous implantable defibrillators.
    Kuschyk J; Milasinovic G; Kühlkamp V; Roberts PR; Zabel M; Molin F; Shorofsky S; Stromberg KD; DeGroot PJ; Murgatroyd FD;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jan; 25(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 24118311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform.
    Irnich WE
    Europace; 2003 Jul; 5(3):243; author reply 243-4. PubMed ID: 12842635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of models of defibrillation to human defibrillation data: implications for optimizing implantable defibrillator capacitance.
    Swerdlow CD; Brewer JE; Kass RM; Kroll MW
    Circulation; 1997 Nov; 96(9):2813-22. PubMed ID: 9386143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanisms of superiority of ascending ramp waveforms: new insights into mechanisms of shock-induced vulnerability and defibrillation.
    Qu F; Li L; Nikolski VP; Sharma V; Efimov IR
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2005 Aug; 289(2):H569-77. PubMed ID: 15792989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct comparison of monophasic, biphasic and sequential pulse defibrillation over a single current pathway.
    Thakur R; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):407-11. PubMed ID: 8608460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reversal of repolarization gradient does not reverse the chirality of shock-induced reentry in the rabbit heart.
    Cheng Y; Nikolski V; Efimov IR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep; 11(9):998-1007. PubMed ID: 11021470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation with or Without Defibrillation Testing.
    Duffett S; El Hajjaji I; Manlucu J; Yee R
    Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2018 Mar; 10(1):119-125. PubMed ID: 29428133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pre-discharge defibrillation testing: Is it still justified?
    Kempa M; Królak T; Drelich Ł; Budrejko S; Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz L; Lewicka E; Kozłowski D; Raczak G
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(5):532-538. PubMed ID: 27387062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Tuned" defibrillation waveforms outperform 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized multi-center study.
    Natarajan S; Henthorn R; Burroughs J; Esberg D; Zweibel S; Ross T; Kroll M; Gianola D; Oza A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S139-42. PubMed ID: 17302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation.
    Bain AC; Swerdlow CD; Love CJ; Ellenbogen KA; Deering TF; Brewer JE; Augostini RS; Tchou PJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jan; 37(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 11145764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.