181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11846988)
1. Prediction models for eye irritation potential based on endpoints of the HETCAM and neutral red uptake tests.
Worth AP; Cronin MT
In Vitr Mol Toxicol; 2001; 14(3):143-56. PubMed ID: 11846988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eye irritation of low-irritant cosmetic formulations: correlation of in vitro results with clinical data and product composition.
Debbasch C; Ebenhahn C; Dami N; Pericoi M; Van den Berghe C; Cottin M; Nohynek GJ
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 15582208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hen egg chorioallantoic membrane bioassay: an in vitro alternative to draize eye irritation test for pesticide screening.
Kishore AS; Surekha PA; Sekhar PV; Srinivas A; Murthy PB
Int J Toxicol; 2008 Nov; 27(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 19482824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Study on using the hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane as an alternative method of draize eye irritation test].
Liao Y; Wang X; Zhang L; Li G
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 May; 33(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 15211792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined in vitro tests as an alternative to in vivo eye irritation tests.
Ying Y; Xingfen Y; Wengai Z; Jinheng C; Jinyu X; Guangyu Y; Xiaohua T; Xiaoping X; Xikun X; Junming H; Xiang G
Altern Lab Anim; 2010 Aug; 38(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 20822323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation project of alternatives for the Draize eye test.
Kalweit S; Gerner I; Spielmann H
Mol Toxicol; 1987-1988 Fall; 1(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 3509706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful prevalidation of the slug mucosal irritation test to assess the eye irritation potency of chemicals.
Adriaens E; Bytheway H; De Wever B; Eschrich D; Guest R; Hansen E; Vanparys P; Schoeters G; Warren N; Weltens R; Whittingham A; Remon JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Aug; 22(5):1285-96. PubMed ID: 18406103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test for irritation potential.
Luepke NP
Food Chem Toxicol; 1985 Feb; 23(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 4040077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays.
Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP
Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [In vitro alternatives to Draize eye irritation test].
Zhou J; Yang M; Yang X; He X
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 Jul; 33(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 15461295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eye irritation potential: usefulness of the HET-CAM under the Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS).
Scheel J; Kleber M; Kreutz J; Lehringer E; Mehling A; Reisinger K; Steiling W
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Apr; 59(3):471-92. PubMed ID: 21310206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. IRAG working group 2. CAM-based assays. Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group.
Spielmann H; Liebsch M; Moldenhauer F; Holzhütter HG; Bagley DM; Lipman JM; Pape WJ; Miltenburger H; de Silva O; Hofer H; Steiling W
Food Chem Toxicol; 1997 Jan; 35(1):39-66. PubMed ID: 9100814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances.
Hayashi K; Mori T; Abo T; Ooshima K; Hayashi T; Komano T; Takahashi Y; Sakaguchi H; Takatsu A; Nishiyama N
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22743076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toxicity evaluation of the photoprotective compound LQFM048: Eye irritation, skin toxicity and genotoxic endpoints.
de Ávila RI; de Sousa Vieira M; Gaeti MP; Moreira LC; de Brito Rodrigues L; de Oliveira GA; Batista AC; Vinhal DC; Menegatti R; Valadares MC
Toxicology; 2017 Feb; 376():83-93. PubMed ID: 27129947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of in vitro cell toxicity with in vivo eye irritation.
Bracher M; Faller C; Spengler J; Reinhardt CA
Mol Toxicol; 1987-1988 Fall; 1(4):561-70. PubMed ID: 3509702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation.
Adriaens E; Dhondt MM; Remon JP
Toxicol In Vitro; 2005 Feb; 19(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 15582359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Eye irritation study of some pesticides on chorioallantoic membrane of the egg.
Kormos E; Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pongrácz A; Lehel J
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 20218518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals.
Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pálovics A; Kismányoki A
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):891-5. PubMed ID: 19226840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The quantitive chlorioallantoic membrane test using trypan blue stain to predict the eye irritancy of liquid scintillation cocktails.
Vinardell MP; García L
Toxicol In Vitro; 2000 Dec; 14(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 11033067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using in vitro prediction models instead of the rabbit eye irritation test to classify and label new chemicals: a post hoc data analysis of the international EC/HO validation study.
Moldenhauer F
Altern Lab Anim; 2003; 31(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 16221042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
