These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11847134)

  • 1. Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand.
    Young L; Swinburn B
    Health Promot Int; 2002 Mar; 17(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11847134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dietary sodium reduction in New Zealand: influence of the Tick label.
    Ning SX; Mainvil LA; Thomson RK; McLean RM
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2017; 26(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28917241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case study of sodium reduction in breakfast cereals and the impact of the Pick the Tick food information program in Australia.
    Williams P; McMahon A; Boustead R
    Health Promot Int; 2003 Mar; 18(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 12571092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tick front-of-pack label has a positive nutritional impact on foods sold in New Zealand.
    Thomson RK; McLean RM; Ning SX; Mainvil LA
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Nov; 19(16):2949-2958. PubMed ID: 27356176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of a Voluntary Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling System on Packaged Food Reformulation: The Health Star Rating System in New Zealand.
    Mhurchu CN; Eyles H; Choi YH
    Nutrients; 2017 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 28829380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do doctors need to exercise caution when recommending products with the Heart Foundation Tick? Pro.
    Stanton RA
    Med J Aust; 2011 Mar; 194(6):284-5. PubMed ID: 21426280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Salt and sugars content of breakfast cereals in the UK from 1992 to 2015.
    Pombo-Rodrigues S; Hashem KM; He FJ; MacGregor GA
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Jun; 20(8):1500-1512. PubMed ID: 28166847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nutritional quality, labelling and promotion of breakfast cereals on the New Zealand market.
    Devi A; Eyles H; Rayner M; Ni Mhurchu C; Swinburn B; Lonsdale-Cooper E; Vandevijvere S
    Appetite; 2014 Oct; 81():253-60. PubMed ID: 24953195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Willingness to eat bread with health benefits: habits, taste and health in bread choice.
    Sajdakowska M; Gębski J; Żakowska-Biemans S; Jeżewska-Zychowicz M
    Public Health; 2019 Feb; 167():78-87. PubMed ID: 30641459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in the sodium content of bread in Australia and New Zealand between 2007 and 2010: implications for policy.
    Dunford EK; Eyles H; Mhurchu CN; Webster JL; Neal BC
    Med J Aust; 2011 Sep; 195(6):346-9. PubMed ID: 21929500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health labelling can influence taste perception and use of table salt for reduced-sodium products.
    Liem DG; Miremadi F; Zandstra EH; Keast RS
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 Dec; 15(12):2340-7. PubMed ID: 22397811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Labelling the salt content in foods: a useful tool in reducing sodium intake in Finland.
    Pietinen P; Valsta LM; Hirvonen T; Sinkko H
    Public Health Nutr; 2008 Apr; 11(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 17605838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Possible impact of the Tick Programme in New Zealand on selected nutrient intakes: tentative estimates and methodological complexities.
    Wilson N; Nghiem N; Eyles H; Ni Mhurchu C; Cobiac LJ; Pearson AL; Cleghorn C; Blakely T
    N Z Med J; 2014 Aug; 127(1399):85-8. PubMed ID: 25145310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nutrition and health claims on healthy and less-healthy packaged food products in New Zealand.
    Al-Ani HH; Devi A; Eyles H; Swinburn B; Vandevijvere S
    Br J Nutr; 2016 Sep; 116(6):1087-94. PubMed ID: 27503596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Product reformulation in the context of nutritional warning labels: Exploration of consumer preferences towards food concepts in three food categories.
    Ares G; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Antúnez L; Machín L; Vidal L; Giménez A
    Food Res Int; 2018 May; 107():669-674. PubMed ID: 29580533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nutrition labelling: perspectives of a bi-national agency for Australia and New Zealand.
    Curran MA
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2002; 11(2):S72-6. PubMed ID: 12074190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nutritional information about sodium: is it worth its salt?
    Gilbey A; Fifield S
    N Z Med J; 2006 Apr; 119(1232):U1934. PubMed ID: 16633393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Nutritional Quality of Breakfast Cereals Sold on the Italian Market: The Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) Study.
    Angelino D; Rosi A; Dall'Asta M; Pellegrini N; Martini D
    Nutrients; 2019 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 31752290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing salt in food; setting product-specific criteria aiming at a salt intake of 5 g per day.
    Dötsch-Klerk M; Goossens WP; Meijer GW; van het Hof KH
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2015 Jul; 69(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 25690867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nutrient profile of 23 596 packaged supermarket foods and non-alcoholic beverages in Australia and New Zealand.
    Ni Mhurchu C; Brown R; Jiang Y; Eyles H; Dunford E; Neal B
    Public Health Nutr; 2016 Feb; 19(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 25868881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.