BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11847406)

  • 1. Natural coral exoskeleton as a bone graft substitute: a review.
    Demers C; Hamdy CR; Corsi K; Chellat F; Tabrizian M; Yahia L
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2002; 12(1):15-35. PubMed ID: 11847406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Osteogenesis induced by the combination of growth factor, fibrin glue and coral; towards a substitute of autologous bone graft. An experimental study on the rabbit].
    Arnaud E; Morieux C; Wybier M; de Vernejoul MC
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1994 Aug; 39(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 7755332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of bovine-derived bone protein with a natural coral carrier as a bone-graft substitute in a canine segmental defect model.
    Sciadini MF; Dawson JM; Johnson KD
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Nov; 15(6):844-57. PubMed ID: 9497809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes.
    Gorna K; Gogolewski S
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(3):813-27. PubMed ID: 14613229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marrow-derived osteoblasts seeded into porous natural coral to prefabricate a vascularised bone graft in the shape of a human mandibular ramus: experimental study in rabbits.
    Chen F; Chen S; Tao K; Feng X; Liu Y; Lei D; Mao T
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Dec; 42(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15544883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is there a role of coral bone substitutes in bone repair?
    Pountos I; Giannoudis PV
    Injury; 2016 Dec; 47(12):2606-2613. PubMed ID: 27836254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The resorption of bone-implanted corals varies with porosity but also with the host reaction.
    Roudier M; Bouchon C; Rouvillain JL; Amédée J; Bareille R; Rouais F; Fricain JC; Dupuy B; Kien P; Jeandot R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Aug; 29(8):909-15. PubMed ID: 7593034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of coral resorption and bone apposition with two natural corals of different porosities.
    Guillemin G; Meunier A; Dallant P; Christel P; Pouliquen JC; Sedel L
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Jul; 23(7):765-79. PubMed ID: 2738087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cellular culture of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on porous calcium-phosphate bone substitutes].
    Chouteau J; Bignon A; Chavassieux P; Chevalier J; Melin M; Fantozzi G; Boivin G; Hartmann D; Carret JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 12610435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes.
    Jensen SS; Aaboe M; Pinholt EM; Hjørting-Hansen E; Melsen F; Ruyter IE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 8820123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science.
    Bauer TW; Muschler GF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Feb; (371):10-27. PubMed ID: 10693546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gross, radiology and ultrasonographic evaluation of coral post-implantation in sheep femur.
    Fadilah A; Zuki AB; Loqman MY; Zamri-Saad M; Norimah Y; Asnah H
    Med J Malaysia; 2004 May; 59 Suppl B():178-9. PubMed ID: 15468876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Natural coral used as a substitute for bone graft. Its role in the economics of blood in spinal surgery].
    Patat JL; Pouliquen JC; Guillemin G
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1992; 58 Suppl 1():115-21. PubMed ID: 1360739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute: A review of experimental studies and biomedical applications.
    Damien E; Revell PA
    J Appl Biomater Biomech; 2004; 2(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 20803439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Natural coral used as a replacement biomaterial in bone grafts].
    Patat JL; Guillemin G
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1989; 34(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 2473677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The use of coral as a substitute for maxillofacial bone reconstruction].
    Zeng RS
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1991 Nov; 26(6):345-7, 389-90. PubMed ID: 1687918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of coral as a bone graft substitute.
    Guillemin G; Patat JL; Fournie J; Chetail M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 May; 21(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 2884221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: what is optimal for bone regeneration?
    Hannink G; Arts JJ
    Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 2():S22-5. PubMed ID: 21714966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjuvant therapies of bone graft around non-cemented experimental orthopedic implants stereological methods and experiments in dogs.
    Baas J
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2008 Aug; 79(330):1-43. PubMed ID: 19065776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of bone graft matrices for human mesenchymal stem cell-directed osteogenesis.
    Harris CT; Cooper LF
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Mar; 68(4):747-55. PubMed ID: 14986329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.