BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11847973)

  • 1. Inhibition of sulfate-reducing bacteria by metal sulfide formation in bioremediation of acid mine drainage.
    Utgikar VP; Harmon SM; Chaudhary N; Tabak HH; Govind R; Haines JR
    Environ Toxicol; 2002 Feb; 17(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 11847973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acute toxicity of heavy metals to acetate-utilizing mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria: EC100 and EC50.
    Utgikar VP; Chen BY; Chaudhary N; Tabak HH; Haines JR; Govind R
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Dec; 20(12):2662-9. PubMed ID: 11764146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bioremediation of acid mine drainage using sulfate-reducing wetland bioreactor: Filling substrates influence, sulfide oxidation and microbial community.
    Wang H; Zhang M; Dong P; Xue J; Liu L
    Chemosphere; 2024 Feb; 349():140789. PubMed ID: 38013025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sulfate reduction at low pH to remediate acid mine drainage.
    Sánchez-Andrea I; Sanz JL; Bijmans MF; Stams AJ
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Mar; 269():98-109. PubMed ID: 24444599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of toxic and inhibitory impact of copper and zinc on mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Utgikar VP; Tabak HH; Haines JR; Govind R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 May; 82(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 12599257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Removal of heavy metals using a novel sulfidogenic AMD treatment system with sulfur reduction: Configuration, performance, critical parameters and economic analysis.
    Sun R; Li Y; Lin N; Ou C; Wang X; Zhang L; Jiang F
    Environ Int; 2020 Mar; 136():105457. PubMed ID: 31926438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advances in biotreatment of acid mine drainage and biorecovery of metals: 1. Metal precipitation for recovery and recycle.
    Tabak HH; Scharp R; Burckle J; Kawahara FK; Govind R
    Biodegradation; 2003 Dec; 14(6):423-36. PubMed ID: 14669873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in biotreatment of acid mine drainage and biorecovery of metals: 2. Membrane bioreactor system for sulfate reduction.
    Tabak HH; Govind R
    Biodegradation; 2003 Dec; 14(6):437-52. PubMed ID: 14669874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Rice straw and sewage sludge as carbon sources for sulfate-reducing bacteria treating acid mine drainage].
    Su Y; Wang J; Peng SC; Yue ZB; Chen TH; Jin J
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Aug; 31(8):1858-63. PubMed ID: 21090305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complete removal of arsenic and zinc from a heavily contaminated acid mine drainage via an indigenous SRB consortium.
    Le Pape P; Battaglia-Brunet F; Parmentier M; Joulian C; Gassaud C; Fernandez-Rojo L; Guigner JM; Ikogou M; Stetten L; Olivi L; Casiot C; Morin G
    J Hazard Mater; 2017 Jan; 321():764-772. PubMed ID: 27720469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced bioremediation of acid mine-influenced groundwater with micro-sized emulsified corn oil droplets (MOD) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (Desulfovibrio vulgaris) in a microcosm assay.
    Hussain F; Kim LH; Kim H; Kim Y; Oh SE; Kim S
    Chemosphere; 2024 Mar; 352():141403. PubMed ID: 38368967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sulfate-reducing bacteria-dominated biofilms that precipitate ZnS in a subsurface circumneutral-pH mine drainage system.
    Labrenz M; Banfield JF
    Microb Ecol; 2004 Apr; 47(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 14994175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competitive Growth of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria with Bioleaching Acidophiles for Bioremediation of Heap Bioleaching Residue.
    Phyo AK; Jia Y; Tan Q; Sun H; Liu Y; Dong B; Ruan R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32326522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sulfur disproportionation realizes an organic-free sulfidogenic process for sustainable treatment of acid mine drainage.
    Zou J; Qiu YY; Li H; Jiang F
    Water Res; 2023 Apr; 232():119647. PubMed ID: 36738555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heavy metal speciation in solid-phase materials from a bacterial sulfate reducing bioreactor using sequential extraction procedure combined with acid volatile sulfide analysis.
    Jong T; Parry DL
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Apr; 6(4):278-85. PubMed ID: 15054535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization and activity studies of highly heavy metal resistant sulphate-reducing bacteria to be used in acid mine drainage decontamination.
    Martins M; Faleiro ML; Barros RJ; Veríssimo AR; Barreiros MA; Costa MC
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):706-13. PubMed ID: 19135795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sulfidogenic biotreatment of synthetic acid mine drainage and sulfide oxidation in anaerobic baffled reactor.
    Bekmezci OK; Ucar D; Kaksonen AH; Sahinkaya E
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(3):670-6. PubMed ID: 21320747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biochemistry, physiology and biotechnology of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Barton LL; Fauque GD
    Adv Appl Microbiol; 2009; 68():41-98. PubMed ID: 19426853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Removal of antimony (Sb(V)) from Sb mine drainage: biological sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation-precipitation.
    Wang H; Chen F; Mu S; Zhang D; Pan X; Lee DJ; Chang JS
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Oct; 146():799-802. PubMed ID: 23993285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nickel, manganese and copper removal by a mixed consortium of sulfate reducing bacteria at a high COD/sulfate ratio.
    Barbosa LP; Costa PF; Bertolino SM; Silva JC; Guerra-Sá R; Leão VA; Teixeira MC
    World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Aug; 30(8):2171-80. PubMed ID: 24710619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.