These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11848177)

  • 1. Measurement of first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.
    Tandetnik S; Garnier S; Lorenzi C
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):355-64. PubMed ID: 11848177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of amplitude compression on first- and second-order modulation detection thresholds in cochlear implant listeners.
    Lorenzi C; Sibellas J; Füllgrabe C; Gallégo S; Fugain C; Meyer B
    Int J Audiol; 2004 May; 43(5):264-70. PubMed ID: 15357409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of the temporal-modulation transfer function for a single listener with cochlear hearing loss and left-hemisphere damage.
    Hescot F; Lorenzi C; Debruille X; Camus JF
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 34(6):341-51. PubMed ID: 11201321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation detection by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Lacher-Fougère S; Demany L
    Audiology; 1998; 37(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 9547924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation.
    Moore BC; Skrodzka E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):327-35. PubMed ID: 11833538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes.
    Füllgrabe C; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 178(1-2):35-43. PubMed ID: 12684175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second-order modulation detection thresholds for pure-tone and narrow-band noise carriers.
    Lorenzi C; Simpson MI; Millman RE; Griffiths TD; Woods WP; Rees A; Green GG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2470-8. PubMed ID: 11757936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences.
    Lacher-Fougère S; Demany L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2519-26. PubMed ID: 16266172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation Detection Interference (MDI) in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):680-6. PubMed ID: 8084198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
    Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of a noise modulation masker on the detection of second-order amplitude modulation.
    Millman RE; Green GG; Lorenzi C; Rees A
    Hear Res; 2003 Apr; 178(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 12684172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1051-60. PubMed ID: 9714924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear hearing loss and the detection of sinusoidal versus random amplitude modulation.
    Grose JH; Porter HL; Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):EL184. PubMed ID: 27586778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulation masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lorenzi C; Micheyl C; Berthommier F; Portalier S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 40(1):200-7. PubMed ID: 9113870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 11527034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensorineural hearing loss impairs sensitivity but spares temporal integration for detection of frequency modulation.
    Wallaert N; Varnet L; Moore BCJ; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):720. PubMed ID: 30180712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly.
    Takahashi GA; Bacon SP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1410-21. PubMed ID: 1494284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.