These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11848177)

  • 21. Effects of hearing impairment and presentation level on masking period patterns for Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes.
    Summers V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2307-17. PubMed ID: 11108371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Monaural envelope correlation perception in listeners with normal hearing and cochlear impairment.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 8114497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Amplitude modulation detection by listeners with unilateral dead regions.
    Moore BC; Vinay
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009; 20(10):597-606. PubMed ID: 20503798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interactions between amplitude modulation and frequency modulation processing: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Paraouty N; Ewert SD; Wallaert N; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):121. PubMed ID: 27475138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gap detection as a function of stimulus loudness for listeners with and without hearing loss.
    Nelson PB; Thomas SD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 9430758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2156-64. PubMed ID: 1597606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-modality matching: a tool for measuring loudness in sensorineural impairment.
    Hellman RP
    Ear Hear; 1999 Jun; 20(3):193-213. PubMed ID: 10386847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity.
    Bonnard D; Dauman R; Semal C; Demany L
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of time and place cues in the detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ernst SM; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4722-31. PubMed ID: 22712945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cochlear hearing loss and the processing of modulation: effects of temporal asynchrony.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):519-27. PubMed ID: 8675845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 3994589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Second-order temporal modulation transfer functions.
    Lorenzi C; Soares C; Vonner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1030-8. PubMed ID: 11519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Critical bandwidth for phase discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1969-76. PubMed ID: 7593919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the Interplay Between Cochlear Gain Loss and Temporal Envelope Coding Deficits.
    Verhulst S; Piktel P; Jagadeesh A; Mauermann M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():467-475. PubMed ID: 27080688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 7876438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
    Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.