These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11848341)

  • 1. Calibration of model constants in a biological reaction model for sewage treatment plants.
    Amano K; Kageyama K; Watanabe S; Takemoto T
    Water Res; 2002 Feb; 36(4):1025-33. PubMed ID: 11848341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modelling of full-scale wastewater treatment plants with different treatment processes using the Activated Sludge Model no. 3.
    Wichern M; Obenaus F; Wulf P; Rosenwinkel KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11496677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration and simulation of two large wastewater treatment plants operated for nutrient removal.
    Ferrer J; Morenilla JJ; Bouzas A; García-Usach F
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):87-94. PubMed ID: 15536994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of dimension uncertainty and model calibration on sewer system assessment.
    Korving H; Clemens F
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(5):35-42. PubMed ID: 16248178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience and extensions to the ASM2 family of models.
    Dudley J; Buck G; Ashley R; Jack A
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):177-86. PubMed ID: 11989871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Modeling and dynamic simulation of the multimode anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic wastewater treatment process].
    Zhou Z; Wu ZC; Wang ZW; Du XZ; Jiang LY; Xing C
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 34(4):1442-7. PubMed ID: 23798127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy analysis of a respirometer for activated sludge dynamic modelling.
    Marsili-Libelli S; Tabani F
    Water Res; 2002 Mar; 36(5):1181-92. PubMed ID: 11902773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new one-dimensional clarifier model--verification using full-scale experimental data.
    De Clercq J; Devisscher M; Boonen I; Vanrolleghem PA; Defrancq J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):105-12. PubMed ID: 12926676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of mathematical tools to improve the design and operation of activated sludge plants. Case study: the new WWTP of Galindo-Bilbao. Part I: Optimum design.
    Rivas A; Ayesa E; Galarza A; Salterain A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):157-65. PubMed ID: 11385842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems.
    Hulsbeek JJ; Kruit J; Roeleveld PJ; van Loosdrech MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):127-36. PubMed ID: 11989865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration of denitrifying activity of polyphosphate accumulating organisms in an extended ASM2d model.
    García-Usach F; Ribes J; Ferrer J; Seco A
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5284-97. PubMed ID: 20638698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Combined hydraulic and biological modelling and full-scale validation of SBR process.
    Keller J; Yuan Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(6):219-28. PubMed ID: 11989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):639-51. PubMed ID: 20828785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parameter estimation procedure for complex non-linear systems: calibration of ASM No. 1 for N-removal in a full-scale oxidation ditch.
    Abusam A; Keesman KJ; van Straten G; Spanjers H; Meinema K
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(7):357-65. PubMed ID: 11385868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency of SBR technology in municipal wastewater treatment plants.
    Steinmetz H; Wiese J; Schmitt TG
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):293-9. PubMed ID: 12361024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrated design of sewers and wastewater treatment plants.
    Vollertsen J; Hvitved-Jacobsen T; Ujang Z; Talib SA
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(9):11-20. PubMed ID: 12448447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Upgrading of wastewater treatment plants for nutrient removal under optimal use of existing structures.
    Winkler S; Gasser M; Schättle W; Kremmel D; Kletzmayr P; Matsché N
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1437-43. PubMed ID: 18496010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Performance and simulation of intermittent decanted extended aeration treatment plants in a tropical climate].
    Dagor C; Sommanawan N; Baudu M; Anderson R
    Environ Technol; 2001 Oct; 22(10):1155-68. PubMed ID: 11767726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation study supporting wastewater treatment plant upgrading.
    Hvala N; Vrecko D; Burica O; Strazar M; Levstek M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(4-5):325-32. PubMed ID: 12361028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.