145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11849153)
1. Laparoscopic lymph node sampling in locally advanced prostate cancer.
Parkin J; Keeley FX; Timoney AG
BJU Int; 2002 Jan; 89(1):14-7; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 11849153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer through extended vs. standard laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Arenas LF; Füllhase C; Boemans P; Fichtner J
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 Jan; 41 Suppl 1():S10-4. PubMed ID: 20094944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Ianuzzi C; Unger P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 7591888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Staging laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.
Shackley DC; Irving SO; Brough WA; O'Reilly PH
BJU Int; 1999 Feb; 83(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 10233490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection allows significantly more accurate staging in "high-risk" prostate cancer compared to MRI or CT.
Borley N; Fabrin K; Sriprasad S; Mondaini N; Thompson P; Muir G; Poulsen J
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):382-6. PubMed ID: 14594685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of nodal metastases at laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy using PSA, Gleason score, and clinical stage in men with localized prostate cancer.
Hoenig DM; Chi S; Porter C; Tackett L; Smith DS; Cohen SI; Stein BS
J Endourol; 1997 Aug; 11(4):263-5. PubMed ID: 9376845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients at high risk for nodal metastases from prostate cancer.
Kava BR; Dalbagni G; Conlon KC; Russo P
Ann Surg Oncol; 1998 Mar; 5(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 9527271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.
Heidenreich A; Varga Z; Von Knobloch R
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1681-6. PubMed ID: 11912387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk prostate cancer.
Wyler SF; Sulser T; Seifert HH; Ruszat R; Forster TH; Gasser TC; Bachmann A
Urology; 2006 Oct; 68(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 17070376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Indications for pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer].
Peneau M; Villers A; Molinié V; Theis D; Soulié M
Prog Urol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):287-94. PubMed ID: 15373168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of digital rectal examination, biopsy Gleason sum and prostate-specific antigen in selecting patients who require pelvic lymph node dissections for prostate cancer.
Rogers E; Gürpinar T; Dillioglugil O; Kattan MW; Goad JR; Scardino PT; Griffith DP
Br J Urol; 1996 Sep; 78(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 8881954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in the staging of prostate cancer.
Stone NN; Stock RG
Mt Sinai J Med; 1999 Jan; 66(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 9989102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era.
DiMarco DS; Zincke H; Sebo TJ; Slezak J; Bergstralh EJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1121-5. PubMed ID: 15758719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of prostate cancer using external beam radiotherapy after laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gerber GS; Bales GT; Gornik HL; Haraf DJ; Chodak GW; Rukstalis DB
Br J Urol; 1996 Jun; 77(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 8705224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and biopsy Gleason score in predicting risk of pelvic lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.
Narayan P; Fournier G; Gajendran V; Leidich R; Lo R; Wolf JS; Jacob G; Nicolaisen G; Palmer K; Freiha F
Urology; 1994 Oct; 44(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 7524237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer by single docking: Do we need a backup procedure?
Gucer F; Misirlioglu S; Ceydeli N; Taskiran C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28255734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high risk prostate cancer].
Shao P; Yin C; Li J; Li P; Ju X; Lyu Q; Meng X; Hua L
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 53(11):847-51. PubMed ID: 26813840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection.
Burkhard FC; Bader P; Schneider E; Markwalder R; Studer UE
Eur Urol; 2002 Aug; 42(2):84-90; discussion 90-2. PubMed ID: 12160577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy. Current indications].
Rioja Sanz C; Blas Marín M; Rioja Sanz L
Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):667-78. PubMed ID: 12224165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
