These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Role of visual familiarity in the word-superiority effects obtained with the simultaneous-matching task. Bruder GA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Feb; 4(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 627853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. McClelland JL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Feb; 2(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 1262797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue. Solman RT Perception; 1982; 11(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 7167339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthography and familiarity effects in word processing. Carr TH; Posner MI; Pollatsek A; Snyder CR J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Dec; 108(4):389-414. PubMed ID: 528909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis. Krueger LE Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task. Chambers SM; Forster KI Mem Cognit; 1975 Sep; 3(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 24203880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction. Krueger LE; Shapiro RG J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding. Krueger LE Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency discrimination: assessing global-level and element-level units in memory. Hock HS; Malcus L; Hasher L J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Apr; 12(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 2939180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading. Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea. Ellis AW; Brooks J; Lavidor M Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Length effects in word perception: we is better than i but worse than you or them. Samuel AG; van Santen JP; Johnston JC J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 6460087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: a shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words. Rutherford BJ Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():74-81. PubMed ID: 25455570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan? Johnson NF; Carnot MJ Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking. Fine EM Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 78(11):831-8. PubMed ID: 11763257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of letter repetition in words and nonwords: the effect of opposite-case distractors. Krueger LE; Stadtlander LM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 1837305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks. Marmurek HH Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments. Allport A Spat Vis; 2009; 22(6):473-91. PubMed ID: 19891849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The word-detection effect: sophisticated guessing or perceptual enhancement? Prinzmetal W; Lyon CE Mem Cognit; 1996 May; 24(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 8718767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]