These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11851660)

  • 81. The use of laparoscopic techniques in the surgical management of rectal prolapse.
    Eu KW
    Singapore Med J; 1996 Oct; 37(5):464-5. PubMed ID: 9046193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. A laparoscopic approach to rectocele repair.
    Winer WK
    Todays Surg Nurse; 1996; 18(3):37-40. PubMed ID: 8974772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Changing approaches to rectal prolapse repair in the elderly.
    Poylin V; Bensley R; Nagle D
    Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2013 Nov; 1(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 24759966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Surgery for internal rectal prolapse revisited.
    Penninckx F
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 Feb; 12(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 20438491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Laparoscopic colopexy in dogs.
    Zhang SX; Wang HB; Zhang JT; Zhang N; Pan L
    J Vet Med Sci; 2013; 75(9):1161-6. PubMed ID: 23615170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Correction to: Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior?
    Mehmood RK; Parker J; Bhuvimanian L; Qasem E; Mohammed AA; Zeeshan M; Grugel K; Carter P; Ahmed S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Apr; 34(4):769. PubMed ID: 30739185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. The Predictive Risk Factor of Postoperative Recurrence Following Altemeier's and Delorme's Procedures for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse: An Analysis of 127 Japanese Patients in a Single Institution.
    Miura Y; Funahashi K; Kurihara A; Kagami S; Suzuki T; Yoshida K; Ushigome M; Kaneko T
    J Anus Rectum Colon; 2024; 8(3):171-178. PubMed ID: 39086885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. A network meta-analysis of surgical treatments of complete rectal prolapse.
    Emile SH; Khan SM; Garoufalia Z; Silva-Alvarenga E; Gefen R; Horesh N; Freund MR; Wexner SD
    Tech Coloproctol; 2023 Oct; 27(10):787-797. PubMed ID: 37150800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. A comparative study between transanal and transabdominal approaches in treatment of complete rectal prolapse.
    Kwak HD; Chung JS; Ju JK
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Mar; 38(1):78. PubMed ID: 36959426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Comparison of abdominal and perineal approach for recurrent rectal prolapse.
    Chung JS; Ju JK; Kwak HD
    Ann Surg Treat Res; 2023 Mar; 104(3):150-155. PubMed ID: 36910558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Using a modified Delphi process to explore international surgeon-reported benefits of robotic-assisted surgery to perform abdominal rectopexy.
    Keating T; Fleming CA; Brannigan AE;
    Tech Coloproctol; 2022 Dec; 26(12):953-962. PubMed ID: 35986805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Technical feasibility and perioperative outcome of laparoscopic resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) and intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA).
    Driouch J; Thaher O; Alnammous G; Dehnst J; Bausch D; Glatz T
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Aug; 407(5):2041-2049. PubMed ID: 35484427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Perioperative Supplemental Oxygen and Postoperative Copeptin Concentrations in Cardiac-Risk Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery-A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Taschner A; Kabon B; Graf A; Adamowitsch N; Falkner von Sonnenburg M; Fraunschiel M; Horvath K; Fleischmann E; Reiterer C
    J Clin Med; 2022 Apr; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 35456178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Update on Robotic Rectal Prolapse Treatment.
    Formisano G; Ferraro L; Salaj A; Giuratrabocchetta S; Pisani Ceretti A; Opocher E; Bianchi PP
    J Pers Med; 2021 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34442349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Mohapatra KC; Swain N; Patro S; Sahoo AK; Sahoo AK; Mishra AK
    Cureus; 2021 Mar; 13(3):e14175. PubMed ID: 33936886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Surgical Treatment of Rectal Prolapse in the Laparoscopic Era; A Review of the Literature.
    Tsunoda A
    J Anus Rectum Colon; 2020; 4(3):89-99. PubMed ID: 32743110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh for recurrent disorders of the posterior pelvic organ compartment.
    Brunner M; Roth H; Günther K; Grützmann R; Matzel KE
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1763-1769. PubMed ID: 31506799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Rectal-prolapse repair in men is safe, but outcomes are not well understood.
    Poylin VY; Irani JL; Rahbar R; Kapadia MR
    Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2019 Aug; 7(4):279-282. PubMed ID: 31413835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.
    Gallo G; Martellucci J; Pellino G; Ghiselli R; Infantino A; Pucciani F; Trompetto M
    Tech Coloproctol; 2018 Dec; 22(12):919-931. PubMed ID: 30554284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: Functional Outcomes after Surgery.
    Ahmad NZ; Stefan S; Adukia V; Naqvi SAH; Khan J
    Surg J (N Y); 2018 Oct; 4(4):e205-e211. PubMed ID: 30377654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.