These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11851988)

  • 1. Power of regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib-pair and DZ twin data.
    Visscher PM; Hopper JL
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 65(Pt 6):583-601. PubMed ID: 11851988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalence between Haseman-Elston and variance-components linkage analyses for sib pairs.
    Sham PC; Purcell S
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1527-32. PubMed ID: 11353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Score test for detecting linkage to quantitative traits.
    Putter H; Sandkuijl LA; van Houwelingen JC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 22(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 11984866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theoretical and empirical power of regression and maximum-likelihood methods to map quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees.
    Yu X; Knott SA; Visscher PM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 75(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 15152343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Weighting improves the "new Haseman-Elston" method.
    Forrest WF
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11359067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transformation of sib-pair values for the Haseman-Elston method.
    Wang D; Lin S; Cheng R; Gao X; Wright FA
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 May; 68(5):1238-49. PubMed ID: 11309688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.
    Forrest WF; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1642-60. PubMed ID: 10762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection and subsequent analysis of sib pair data for QTL detection.
    Chatziplis DG; Hamann H; Haley CS
    Genet Res; 2001 Oct; 78(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 11732095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A score-statistic approach for the mapping of quantitative-trait loci with sibships of arbitrary size.
    Wang K; Huang J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 70(2):412-24. PubMed ID: 11791211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.
    Etzel CJ; Shete S; Beasley TM; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Amos CI
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):108-16. PubMed ID: 12931049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. X-linked extension of the revised Haseman-Elston algorithm for linkage analysis in sib pairs.
    Wiener H; Elston RC; Tiwari HK
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):97-107. PubMed ID: 12931048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the differences between maximum likelihood and regression interval mapping in the analysis of quantitative trait loci.
    Kao CH
    Genetics; 2000 Oct; 156(2):855-65. PubMed ID: 11014831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A unified Haseman-Elston method for testing linkage with quantitative traits.
    Xu X; Weiss S; Xu X; Wei LJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):1025-8. PubMed ID: 10961909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adding further power to the Haseman and Elston method for detecting linkage in larger sibships: weighting sums and differences.
    Shete S; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):79-85. PubMed ID: 12931046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the robustness of the new Haseman-Elston quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure.
    Allison DB; Fernández JR; Heo M; Beasley TM
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Jul; 67(1):249-52. PubMed ID: 10820126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power of quantitative trait locus mapping for polygenic binary traits using generalized and regression interval mapping in multi-family half-sib designs.
    Kadarmideen HN; Janss LL; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2000 Dec; 76(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 11204977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
    Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.