These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11853247)

  • 1. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty.
    Salama FS; Al-Hammad NS
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 Jan; 12(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 11853247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage using invasive and noninvasive technique of light cure glass ionomer and flowable polyacid modified composite resin used as pit and fissure sealant.
    Singla A; Garg S; Jindal SK; Suma Sogi HP; Sharma D
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21891886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of three sealants following conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures.
    Hatibovic-Kofman S; Butler SA; Sadek H
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2001 Nov; 11(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 11759100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
    Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of pumice, fissure enameloplasty and air abrasion on sealant microleakage.
    Blackwood JA; Dilley DC; Roberts MW; Swift EJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12064490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study.
    Pérez-Lajarín L; Cortés-Lillo O; García-Ballesta C; Cózar-Hidalgo A
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 12762604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of different techniques of enamel preparation for pit and fissure sealing.
    Courson F; Renda AM; Attal JP; Bouter D; Ruse D; Degrange M
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 15008338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enameloplasty effects on microleakage of pit and fissure sealants under load: an in vitro study.
    Zervou C; Kugel G; Leone C; Zavras A; Doherty EH; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 11314412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid-modified resin composite used as fissure sealant on air-abraded permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Turgut MD; Attar N; Altay N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12760698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage and penetration of a hydrophilic sealant and a conventional resin-based sealant as a function of preparation techniques: a laboratory study.
    Khogli AE; Cauwels R; Vercruysse C; Verbeeck R; Martens L
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Jan; 23(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 22276649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants.
    Eronat N; Bardakçi Y; Sipahi M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 14998210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel.
    Hebling J; Feigal RJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11763928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of tooth preparation on sealant success--an in vitro study.
    Subramaniam P; Babu KL; Naveen HK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2009; 33(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19725240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods.
    Luo Y; Tay FR; Lo EC; Wei SH
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):495-500. PubMed ID: 10960753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols.
    Asselin ME; Fortin D; Sitbon Y; Rompré PH
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18402096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of a conventional sealant and a flowable composite on minimally invasive prepared fissures.
    Francescut P; Lussi A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 17024941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.