These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11853531)

  • 1. Quantitative assessments of sensitivity to reinforcement contingencies in mental retardation.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 2002 Mar; 107(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 11853531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reinforcer rate effects and behavioral momentum in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Dube WV; McIlvane WJ; Mazzitelli K; McNamara B
    Am J Ment Retard; 2003 Mar; 108(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
    Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Owens JC; Slevin I
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992; 25(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 1634435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of a reinforcer choice assessment scale for persons with severe and profound mental retardation.
    Matson JL; Bielecki J; Mayville EA; Smalls Y; Bamburg JW; Baglio CS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 10542972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary and secondary reinforcers in performance of a 1.0-mile walk/jog by adolescents with moderate mental retardation.
    Taylor J; French R; Kinnison L; O'Brien T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1265-6. PubMed ID: 10052087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of reinforcement schedules to increase independent responding in individuals with intellectual disabilities.
    Hausman NL; Ingvarsson ET; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 24114759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional analysis of challenging behavior in people with severe intellectual disabilities.
    Delgado-Casas C; Navarro JI; Garcia-Gonzalez-Gordon R; Marchena E
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Dec; 115(3):655-69. PubMed ID: 25375028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staff perceptions of reinforcer responsiveness and aberrant behaviors in people with mental retardation.
    Bihm EM; Poindexter AR; Kienlen TL; Smith BL
    J Autism Dev Disord; 1992 Mar; 22(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 1592766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
    Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG; Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Kogan JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aggression as positive reinforcement in people with intellectual disabilities.
    May ME
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(6):2214-24. PubMed ID: 21700420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Employing computer technology to assess visual attention in young children and adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1997 May; 65(2):141-70. PubMed ID: 9169208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prolonged behavioral effects of in utero exposure to lead or methyl mercury: reduced sensitivity to changes in reinforcement contingencies during behavioral transitions and in steady state.
    Newland MC; Yezhou S; Lögdberg B; Berlin M
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 1994 May; 126(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 8184434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of selected reinforcers on the cardiorespiratory exercise behavior of profoundly mentally retarded youth.
    French R; Silliman LM; Ben-Ezra V; Landrieu-Seiter M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Apr; 74(2):584-6. PubMed ID: 1594419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of alternative responses on behavior exposed to noncontingent reinforcement.
    Virues-Ortega J; Iwata BA; Fahmie TA; Harper JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):603-12. PubMed ID: 24114223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for reaching by individuals with mental retardation: empty and filled glasses.
    Ushiyama M; Hosokawa T; Tanaka A; Okuzumi H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):871-6. PubMed ID: 11153863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. PubMed ID: 8995834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does supplementary reinforcement of stereotypy facilitate extinction?
    Dozier CL; Iwata BA; Wilson DM; Thomason-Sassi JL; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(1):242-55. PubMed ID: 24114097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the effects of "quality" of attention in the functional analysis of destructive behavior.
    Richman DM; Hagopian LP
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 9987810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Behavioral disorders and substance abuse in adolescents with mental retardation].
    Papachristou E; Anagnostopoulos D
    Psychiatriki; 2014; 25(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 25035183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.