139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11853864)
1. Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio).
Barbet I; Fagot J
Behav Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 132(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 11853864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Control of the corridor illusion in baboons (Papio papio) by gradient and linear-perspective depth cues.
Barbet I; Fagot J
Perception; 2007; 36(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 17455754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moving shadows contribute to the corridor illusion in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).
Imura T; Tomonaga M
J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19685969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Complexity of context and orientation of figure in the corridor illusion.
Fineman MB
Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 7290859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moon illusion in pictures: a multimechanism approach.
Coren S; Aks DJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 May; 16(2):365-80. PubMed ID: 2142205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Illusions within an Illusion.
Deręgowski JB
Perception; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1416-21. PubMed ID: 26562856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of grouping abilities in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio) with the Ebbinghaus illusion.
Parron C; Fagot J
J Comp Psychol; 2007 Nov; 121(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 18085924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The box alignment illusion: an orientation illusion induced by pictorial depth.
Enns JT; Coren S
Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1163-74. PubMed ID: 8539091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of linear perspective on relative size discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens).
Imura T; Tomonaga M; Yagi A
Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 17766056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Things are deeper than they are wide: a strange error of distance estimation.
Hammersley R
Perception; 1983; 12(5):589-91. PubMed ID: 6676709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The natural moon illusion: a multifactor angular account.
Plug C; Ross HE
Perception; 1994; 23(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 7971109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inappropriate constancy scaling as a factor in the Müller-Lyer illusion.
Morrison LC
Br J Psychol; 1977 Feb; 68(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 851698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereoscopic depth and the occlusion illusion.
Palmer SE; Schloss KB
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1083-94. PubMed ID: 19525539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The apparent distance of interior and exterior corners: a test of Gregory's misapplied size constancy explanation for the Mueller-Lyer illusion.
McGraw KO; Stanford J
J Gen Psychol; 1994 Jan; 121(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 8021629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Illusion reversal rate as a function of subjective depth.
Borresen CR
J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2313278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The vista paradox: a natural visual illusion.
Walker JT; Rupich RC; Powell JL
Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jan; 45(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2913569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Length illusion in fractional Müller-Lyer stimuli: an object-perception approach.
Redding GM; Hawley E
Perception; 1993; 22(7):819-28. PubMed ID: 8115239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of apparent depth and context in the perception of the Ponzo illusion.
Schiffman HR; Thompson JG
Perception; 1978; 7(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 628580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depth perception in Pandora's box and size illusion: evolution with age.
Chevrier J; Delorme A
Perception; 1983; 12(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 6657424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assimilation and contrast in the parallel lines illusion?
Jaeger T
Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Jun; 52(3):837-8. PubMed ID: 7267258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]