These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11854678)

  • 1. Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy.
    Brosky ME; Pesun IJ; Lowder PD; Delong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb; 87(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 11854678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of dental arch reproduction using three-dimensional optical digitization.
    Brosky ME; Major RJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Nov; 90(5):434-40. PubMed ID: 14586306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
    Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
    Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Martinez LJ; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Prosthodont; 1998 Jun; 7(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 9743664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of the second pour casts using dual-arch trays.
    Broilo JR; Ghiggi PC; Borges GA; Burnett LH; Spohr AM
    Stomatologija; 2011; 13(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21558786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effect on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays].
    Ishida K
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 33(4):977-90. PubMed ID: 2489749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts.
    Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.