These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11855387)
1. Of course patients should be told. Goodare H BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7334):420-1. PubMed ID: 11855387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The surgeon is only one factor. Treasure T BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7334):421. PubMed ID: 11855388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What to do about poor clinical performance in clinical trials. Mason S; Nicholl J; Lilford R BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7334):419-20. PubMed ID: 11850378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Multiple competing interests surround ethical review of clinical trials. Henderson D Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):686-7. PubMed ID: 16248869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [New regulation for multicenter clinical trials and its repercussions on the function of current clinical trial ethics committees]. GarcĂa Herrera JL Rev Esp Quimioter; 2003 Dec; 16(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 14961130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research? Gandevia SC; McKeown T; Wright MM; Briody GP; Watson JD Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):285. PubMed ID: 9762073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research? O'Brien EA; Saltman DC; Berglund CA Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):284-5. PubMed ID: 9762072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research? Henman MJ; Tattersall MH; Brown RF Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):283-4. PubMed ID: 9762071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research? Clarke CW Med J Aust; 1998 Sep; 169(5):283. PubMed ID: 9762070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Do patients participating in clinical trials want to know study results? Partridge AH; Burstein HJ; Gelman RS; Marcom PK; Winer EP J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):491-2. PubMed ID: 12644548 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Regulations of the ethical evaluation system of scientific and clinical research in connection with Poland joining the European Union]. Raszeja S Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(2-3):151-4. PubMed ID: 15495560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should there be an accredited ethics committee system for centralised review of multicentre clinical research? Cohen M Med J Aust; 1998 May; 168(10):528. PubMed ID: 9631688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. StatBite: Key findings from the "Impact on clinical research of European legislation" report. J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Mar; 102(5):293. PubMed ID: 20173122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Independent controls of quality in therapeutic trials. Apropos of an experience of 11 external audits of clinical investigators performed in 2 European multicenter trials]. Bergmann JF; Lagier G; Calvo F; Chazelle F; Caulin C Therapie; 1988; 43(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 3067418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary: doctors are obliged to be honest with their patients. Wu AW BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7296):1238-9. PubMed ID: 11398784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. European move affects academic trials research. Sinha G J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Aug; 98(16):1100-1. PubMed ID: 16912258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]