BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11856899)

  • 1. Four-choice drug discrimination in pigeons.
    Li M; McMillan DE
    Behav Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 12(8):621-8. PubMed ID: 11856899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of amphetamine-CNS depressant combinations and of other CNS stimulants in four-choice drug discriminations.
    Li M; Wessinger WD; McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):77-97. PubMed ID: 16156138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of sequential drug discriminations under fixed-interval schedules for long time periods without training.
    Li M; McMillan DE
    Eur J Pharmacol; 2003 Aug; 476(1-2):79-85. PubMed ID: 12969752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The discrimination of drug mixtures using a four-choice procedure in pigeons.
    McMillan DE; Li M
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Nov; 164(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 12404084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of drug discrimination history on drug discrimination and on punished and unpunished responding.
    Li M; McMillan DE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Sep; 61(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 9715811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influencing the specificity of drug mixture discriminations by varying the training procedure.
    Stolerman IP; Mariathasan EA; White JA
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Nov; 10(6-7):657-64. PubMed ID: 10780507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Schedule control of quantal and graded dose-effect curves in a drug-drug-saline discrimination.
    McMillan DE; Li M; Hardwick WC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001 Mar; 68(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 11325391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for perceptual masking of the discriminative morphine stimulus.
    Gauvin DV; Young AM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 98(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 2502792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of training paradigm on specificity of drug mixture discriminations.
    Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1999 Oct; 64(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 10515322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphine discrimination in the pigeon using a color tracking procedure.
    Paule MG; Wenger GR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Mar; 24(3):597-604. PubMed ID: 3703895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drug discrimination and generalization in pigeons.
    Leberer MR; Fowler SC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1977 Nov; 7(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 594094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminative stimulus properties of local anesthetics in d-amphetamine- and pentobarbital-trained pigeons.
    Zacny JP; Woolverton WL
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Jul; 33(3):527-31. PubMed ID: 2587593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discriminative stimulus effects of opioids in pigeons trained to discriminate fentanyl, bremazocine and water: evidence of pharmacological selectivity.
    Picker MJ; Cook CD
    Behav Pharmacol; 1997 Jun; 8(2-3):160-73. PubMed ID: 9833011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drug discrimination under concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules.
    McMillan DE; Hardwick WC; Li M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 11831785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the discriminative stimulus properties of U50,488 and morphine in pigeons.
    Picker M; Dykstra LA
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1987 Dec; 243(3):938-45. PubMed ID: 3320348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AND and AND-OR drug mixture discriminations in rats: generalization to single drugs and drug mixtures.
    Mariathasan EA; Stolerman IP; White JA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Mar; 143(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 10227080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of drug discrimination history on the generalization of pentobarbital to other drugs.
    McMillan DE; Sun WL; Hardwick WC
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1996 Jul; 278(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 8764335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of drugs on responding under concurrent fixed-interval schedules and concurrent fixed-ratio schedules.
    McMillan DE; Li M
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Dec; 10(8):765-74. PubMed ID: 10780292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drug discrimination under two concurrent fixed-interval fixed-interval schedules.
    McMillan DE; Li M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):55-77. PubMed ID: 10966096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias of phencyclidine discrimination by the schedule of reinforcement.
    McMillan DE; Wenger GR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jul; 42(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 6481300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.