171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11857297)
1. Prognostic importance of tumor size for localized conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma: assessment of TNM T1 and T2 tumor categories and comparison with other prognostic parameters.
Delahunt B; Kittelson JM; McCredie MR; Reeve AE; Stewart JH; Bilous AM
Cancer; 2002 Feb; 94(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 11857297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic stratification of localized renal cell carcinoma by tumor size.
Bedke J; Pritsch M; Buse S; Jakobi H; Elsaesser KH; Pahernik S; Haferkamp A; Hohenfellner M
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 18485376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma: significance of tumor classification with the 1997 TNM staging system.
Gettman MT; Blute ML; Spotts B; Bryant SC; Zincke H
Cancer; 2001 Jan; 91(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 11180082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New cut-off point between T1 and T2 renal cell carcinoma - necessary for a better discriminatory power of the TNM classification.
Wunderlich H; Dreihaupt M; Schlichter A; Kosmehl H; Reichelt O; Schubert J
Urol Int; 2004; 72(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 14963352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of tumor size on the clinical outcomes of patients with Robson State I renal cell carcinoma.
Kinouchi T; Saiki S; Meguro N; Maeda O; Kuroda M; Usami M; Kotake T
Cancer; 1999 Feb; 85(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 10091742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of tumour size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma.
Steiner T; Knels R; Schubert J
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 15306102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reevaluation of the 1997 TNM classification for renal cell carcinoma: T1 and T2 cutoff point at 4.5 rather than 7 cm. better correlates with clinical outcome.
Zisman A; Pantuck AJ; Chao D; Dorey F; Said JW; Gitlitz BJ; de Kernion JB; Figlin RA; Belldegrun AS
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 11435822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria.
Tsui KH; Shvarts O; Smith RB; Figlin RA; deKernion JB; Belldegrun A
J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1090-5; quiz 1295. PubMed ID: 10737472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Survival analysis for localized renal cell carcinoma. Prognostic value of 1997 TNM classification].
García Torrelles M; Sánchez Sanchís M; Beltrán Armada JR; Bautista Rentero D; Vidal Moreno J; Sanjuán de Laorden C
Actas Urol Esp; 2006; 30(7):655-60. PubMed ID: 17058609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the prognostic significance of perirenal fat invasion and tumor size in patients with pT1-pT3a localized renal cell carcinoma in a comprehensive multicenter study of the CORONA project. Can we improve prognostic discrimination for patients with stage pT3a tumors?
Brookman-May SD; May M; Wolff I; Zigeuner R; Hutterer GC; Cindolo L; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Feciche B; Figenshau RS; Madison K; Sánchez-Chapado M; Santiago Martin Mdel C; Salzano L; Lotrecchiano G; Zastrow S; Wirth M; Sountoulides P; Shariat S; Waidelich R; Stief C; Gunia S; ;
Eur Urol; 2015 May; 67(5):943-51. PubMed ID: 25684695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
Elmore JM; Kadesky KT; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 14635066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma.
Javidan J; Stricker HJ; Tamboli P; Amin MB; Peabody JO; Deshpande A; Menon M; Amin MB
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1277-81. PubMed ID: 10492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified cancer TNM classification for localized renal cell carcinoma based on the prognostic analysis of 3748 cases from a single center.
Zhang J; Li X; Lin J; Liu Z; Tian Y; Wang Q
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2022 Jan; 100(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 34779659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic impact of tumor size on pT2 renal cell carcinoma: an international multicenter experience.
Klatte T; Patard JJ; Goel RH; Kleid MD; Guille F; Lobel B; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Altieri V; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Prayer-Galetti T; Allhoff EP; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Figlin RA; Kabbinavar FF; Pantuck AJ; Belldegrun AS; Lam JS
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):35-40; discussion 40. PubMed ID: 17521678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pathological prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma].
Rey Rey J; León Ramírez D; López García S; Fernández Vázquez P; Benavente Delgado J; Ojea Calvo A
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20223135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collecting system invasion and Fuhrman grade but not tumor size facilitate prognostic stratification of patients with pT2 renal cell carcinoma.
Brookman-May S; May M; Zigeuner R; Shariat SF; Scherr DS; Chromecki T; Moch H; Wild PJ; Mohamad-Al-Ali B; Cindolo L; Wieland WF; Schips L; De Cobelli O; Rocco B; Santoro L; De Nunzio C; Tubaro A; Coman I; Feciche B; Truss M; Dalpiaz O; Hohenfellner M; Gilfrich C; Wirth MP; Burger M; Pahernik S;
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2175-81. PubMed ID: 22014800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urinary collecting system invasion is an independent prognostic factor of organ confined renal cell carcinoma.
Verhoest G; Avakian R; Bensalah K; Thuret R; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Tostain J; Guille F; Cindolo L; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L; Rioux-Leclercq N; Patard JJ
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):854-9. PubMed ID: 19616244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reevaluation of TNM staging of renal cortical tumors: recurrence and survival for T1N0M0 and T3aN0M0 tumors are equivalent.
Gilbert SM; Murphy AM; Katz AE; Goluboff ET; Sawczuk IS; Olsson CA; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 16904438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
