These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11857661)

  • 1. Subjective and objective incontinence 5 to 10 years after Burch colposuspension.
    Kulseng-Hanssen S; Berild GH
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2002; 21(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11857661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study.
    Kjølhede P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):767-72. PubMed ID: 16026403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The tension free vaginal tape operation for women with mixed incontinence: Do preoperative variables predict the outcome?
    Kulseng-Hanssen S; Husby H; Schiotz HA
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(1):115-21; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 16894616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of a national database of the results of surgery for urinary incontinence in women.
    Kulseng-Hanssen S
    BJOG; 2003 Nov; 110(11):975-82. PubMed ID: 14592581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What makes men leak? An investigation of objective and self-report measures of urinary incontinence early after radical prostatectomy.
    Mungovan SF; Huijbers BP; Hirschhorn AD; Patel MI
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Feb; 35(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 25418678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial.
    Paraiso MF; Walters MD; Karram MM; Barber MD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 104(6):1249-58. PubMed ID: 15572485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Burch colposuspension].
    Almeida M; Colaço J; Santos Pereira H; Vieira A; Gonçalves V; Retto H; Meirinho M
    Acta Med Port; 2004; 17(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 15636723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longer is better than shorter: The added value of the seven-day pad test in the post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence.
    Martínez-Cuenca E; Sánchez JV; Bonillo MÁ; Morán E; Broseta E; Arlandis S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2021 Apr; 40(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33739536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ultra-short perineal pad-test for evaluation of female stress urinary incontinence treatment.
    Persson J; Bergqvist CE; Wølner-Hanssen P
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2001; 20(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 11385694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
    Albo ME; Richter HE; Brubaker L; Norton P; Kraus SR; Zimmern PE; Chai TC; Zyczynski H; Diokno AC; Tennstedt S; Nager C; Lloyd LK; FitzGerald M; Lemack GE; Johnson HW; Leng W; Mallett V; Stoddard AM; Menefee S; Varner RE; Kenton K; Moalli P; Sirls L; Dandreo KJ; Kusek JW; Nyberg LM; Steers W;
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2143-55. PubMed ID: 17517855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the role of Burch colposuspension fading away in this epoch for treating female urinary incontinence?
    Ng S; Tee YT; Tsui KP; Chen GD
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):937-42. PubMed ID: 17139462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A surgical technique to adjust bladder neck suspension in laparoscopic Burch colposuspension.
    Yang JM; Yang SH; Huang WC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 16825068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and urodynamic characteristics of women with recurrent urinary incontinence after Burch colposuspension.
    Kjølhede P; Rydén G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1997 May; 76(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 9197450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Does a Combined Fascial Sling - Burch Colposuspension Display Advantages over a Fascial Sling alone for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Females?].
    Pfitzenmaier J; Gilfrich C; Faldum A; Müller M; Hohenfellner M; Thüroff JW
    Aktuelle Urol; 2003 May; 34(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 14566688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Significance of pad test loss for the evaluation of women with urinary incontinence.
    Paick JS; Ku JH; Shin JW; Park K; Son H; Oh SJ; Kim SW
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2005; 24(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15468291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results of Burch colposuspension.
    Akpinar H; Cetinel B; Demirkesen O; Tufek I; Yaycioglu O; Solok V
    Int J Urol; 2000 Apr; 7(4):119-25. PubMed ID: 10810967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do Urinary Leakage Circumstances in Women With Urinary Incontinence Correlate With Physician Diagnosis and Urodynamic Results? A Questionnaire Validation Study.
    Nyangoh Timoh K; Fauconnier A; Ravit M; Bader G; Varas Ramos C; Fritel X
    Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():55-60. PubMed ID: 28506861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Burch colposuspension for recurrent urinary stress incontinence following retropubic continence surgery.
    Maher C; Dwyer P; Carey M; Gilmour D
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jul; 106(7):719-24. PubMed ID: 10428530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
    Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody DJ; Grant AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD002912. PubMed ID: 12535443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.