204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11858076)
1. Battlefield: mercury--the element, not the planet.
Anderson CF
Tex Dent J; 2000 Dec; 117(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 11858076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimated quantity of mercury in amalgam waste water residue released by dentists into the sewerage system in Ontario, Canada.
Adegbembo AO; Watson PA
J Can Dent Assoc; 2004 Dec; 70(11):759, 759a-759f. PubMed ID: 15588550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of CDA best management practices and amalgam separators to improve the management of dental wastewater.
Condrin AK
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):583-92. PubMed ID: 15468540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Our fair share.
Maihofer MG
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2003 May; 85(5):12. PubMed ID: 12756666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Turning amalgam green.
Alty CT
RDH; 1995 Oct; 15(10):12-4, 62. PubMed ID: 9534466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of amalgam separators on mercury loading to wastewater treatment plants.
Stone ME
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):593-600. PubMed ID: 15468541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mercury pollution in dental office waste water.
Chilibeck R
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Apr; 66(4):174-5. PubMed ID: 10789166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental mercury reduction review and regulatory update.
Maguire J
Northwest Dent; 2014; 93(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 24839793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. High mercury emissions from dental clinics despite amalgam separators.
Hylander LD; Lindvall A; Gahnberg L
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jun; 362(1-3):74-84. PubMed ID: 16054673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dealing with amalgam waste.
Berman L
J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):290; author reply 290-1. PubMed ID: 10927888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stewards of the environment: dentists and amalgam separators.
Lingle SD
Northwest Dent; 2002; 81(6):37-8. PubMed ID: 12572106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dental amalgam: regulating its use and disposal.
Pichay TJ
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):580-2. PubMed ID: 15468539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mercury recovery in situ of four different dental amalgam separators.
Hylander LD; Lindvall A; Uhrberg R; Gahnberg L; Lindh U
Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 366(1):320-36. PubMed ID: 16182343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Michigan's successful dental bulk mercury collection program.
Verhagen CM; Hughes J; Hinshon R
J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996; 78(9):38, 75. PubMed ID: 9520658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of removing amalgam from dental wastewater.
Vandeven JA; McGinnis SL
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 15468537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The concern over mercury and wastewater.
Hughes J; Ingram BJ
J Mich Dent Assoc; 1995; 77(4):28-9. PubMed ID: 9508917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sewer rats.
Maihofer MG
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 83(3):14. PubMed ID: 11324226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Improper waste disposal of silver-mercury amalgam.
de Souza JP; Nozawa SR; Honda RT
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012 May; 88(5):797-801. PubMed ID: 22395198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bumble bee: my nemesis.
Carney KK
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 39(6):353, 356. PubMed ID: 21823492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dental amalgam and environmental mercury: Minnesota shortens the curve.
Westman JF
Northwest Dent; 2001; 80(5):21. PubMed ID: 11699155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
