294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11858283)
1. The failure of traditional arguments in the vivisection debate.
Gregory TR
Public Aff Q; 2000 Apr; 14(2):159-82. PubMed ID: 11858283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Philosophers and antivivisectionism.
Sprigge T
ATLA Abstr; 1985 Dec; 13(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 11651866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Animals, science, and ethics -- Section I. Ethical theory and the moral status of animals.
Russow LM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):S4-7. PubMed ID: 11650365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The prospects for consensus and convergence in the animal rights debate.
Varner GE
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8045765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical and theological objections to animal cloning.
Linzey A
Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Sep; No. 131():18-22. PubMed ID: 11655250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Animals, science, and ethics -- Section II. Animals in science: the justification issue.
Donnelley S
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):S8-13. PubMed ID: 11650366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Formulation of ethical standards for use of animals in medical research.
Rowan AN
Toxicol Lett; 1993 May; 68(1-2):63-71. PubMed ID: 8516776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory animals and the art of empathy.
Thomas D
J Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; 31(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 15800357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Animal experimentation: a rational approach towards drug development.
Kumar V; Singh PN; Mishra B
Indian J Exp Biol; 2000 Jun; 38(6):540-8. PubMed ID: 11116523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are animals people too?
Wright R
New Repub; 1990 Mar; No. 3921():20-22, 26-27. PubMed ID: 11651975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biotechnology: ethics, morality, and consumer acceptance.
McDermott TJ
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1994 May; 204(10):1622-6. PubMed ID: 8050942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical scores for animal experiments.
Porter DG
Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6365):101-2. PubMed ID: 1545854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Against the pariah's moral. Shopenhauer on the ethics of vivisection].
Muratori C
ALTEX; 2008; 25(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 19129958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arguments for the ethical permissibility of transgenic xenografting.
Bramstedt KA
Gene Ther; 2000 Apr; 7(8):633-4. PubMed ID: 10800084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Animals, science, and ethics -- Section III. Critical anthropomorphism, animal suffering, and the ecological context.
Morton DB; Berghardt GM; Smith JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):S13-9. PubMed ID: 11650362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethical thinking of animal researchers: problems and prospects.
Arluke A
New Biol; 1991 Jan; 3(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 2039765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accept no substitutes: the ethics of alternatives.
Marks J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; Suppl():S16-8. PubMed ID: 23138423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Different views on ethics: how animal ethics is situated in a committee culture.
Ideland M
J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 19332584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pain, vivisection, and the value of life.
Frey RG
J Med Ethics; 2005 Apr; 31(4):202-4; discussion 204. PubMed ID: 15800358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contested terrain. Beastly questions.
White RB; Fox MW
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):39-42. PubMed ID: 2703339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
