These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11858285)

  • 1. Defending abortion: should we treat the body as property?
    Roy I
    Public Aff Q; 1999 Oct; 13(4):309-29. PubMed ID: 11858285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drawing lines: the abortion perplex and the presuppositions of applied ethics.
    Weston A
    Monist; 1984 Oct; 67():589-604. PubMed ID: 16100833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three levels of discussion about abortion.
    Carlson J
    Dimension; 1976; 8(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 11663762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The intrinsic value of human life: a critique of Life's Dominion.
    Lazarev N
    E Law; 2005 Jul; 12(1-2):E7. PubMed ID: 16903026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Causation, responsibility and foetal personhood.
    Cox N
    North Irel Leg Q; 2000; 51(4):579-96. PubMed ID: 16528849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bioethical consideration of maternal-fetal issues.
    Post LF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):757-75. PubMed ID: 12455510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The abortion controversy and the claim that this body is mine.
    Wicclair MR
    Soc Theory Pract; 1981; 7(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 11651684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A defense of the neglected rhetorical strategy (NRS).
    Reardon DC
    Ethics Med; 2002; 18(2):23-32. PubMed ID: 14700036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortions and distortions: an analysis of morally irrelevant factors in Thomson's violinist thought experiment.
    Hershenov DB
    Soc Theory Pract; 2001 Jan; 27(1):129-48. PubMed ID: 12564447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioethics and the law--the impact of genetic technology on prenatal management.
    McGivern B
    E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E9. PubMed ID: 16969924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion in America: is compromise possible?
    Hodges SA
    J Legal Stud; 1999-2000; 10():175-89. PubMed ID: 15991406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The abortion culture.
    Thimmesch N
    Newsweek; 1973 Jul; 82(2):7. PubMed ID: 11663386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
    Walen A
    Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reconciling fetal/maternal conflicts.
    Kim RH
    Ida Law Rev; 1990-1991; 27(2):223-48. PubMed ID: 16032814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethics and fetal research.
    Callahan S; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003; 10(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 16175729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embryonic rights: self-interest and the Thirteenth Amendment.
    Lebovitz RM
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2003; 3(4):681-7. PubMed ID: 15038382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion and maternal-fetal conflict: broadening our concerns.
    Shultz MM
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1992; 1():79-98. PubMed ID: 16437820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rights of the fetus.
    Hathout HM
    J Kuwait Med Assoc; 1974 Jun; 8(2):113-4. PubMed ID: 11663466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate hominization from the systems perspective.
    Austriaco NP
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 15658028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.