149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11858514)
1. Hormesis--does it have relevance at the population, community or ecosystem levels of organization?
Giesy JP
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):517-20; discussion 529-31. PubMed ID: 11858514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hormesis in ecological risk assessment: a useful concept, a confusing term, and/or a distraction?
Menzie CA
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):521-3; discussion 529-31. PubMed ID: 11858515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: hormesis and ecological risk assessment.
Rand GM
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):525-6; discussion 529-31. PubMed ID: 11858516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The implications of hormesis to ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment.
Chapman PM
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):499-505. PubMed ID: 11858510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary: role of hormesis in ecological risk assessment.
Elnabarawy M
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):511; discussion 529-31. PubMed ID: 11858512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The implications of hormesis to ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment (ERA).
Gentile JH
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):513-5; discussion 529-31. PubMed ID: 11858513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Experiments, analyses and decisions: hormesis in ecotoxicology.
Bailer AJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):507-9; discussion 529-31. PubMed ID: 11858511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Focus on exposure-response relationships, and complex forms will come naturally.
Suter GW
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2001 Oct; 20(10):527-8; discussion 529-31. PubMed ID: 11858517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference dose (RfD): the possible impact of hormesis.
Barnes DG
J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 10715610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precaution, institutions, incentives, heuristics, regulation and hormesis: comments on 'Hormesis in precautionary regulatory culture: models preferences and the advancement of science'.
Morris J
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2007 Nov; 26(11):851-3; discussion 875-6. PubMed ID: 18042579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should hormesis be the default model in risk assessment?
Calabrese EJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2005 May; 24(5):243. PubMed ID: 16004186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Hormesis and the law: introduction.
Calabrese EJ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 18480128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecological risk assessment: implications of hormesis.
van der Schalie WH; Gentile JH
J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 10715611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hormesis: why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1451-74. PubMed ID: 18275256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hormesis and toxicological risk assessment.
Rodricks JV
Toxicol Sci; 2003 Feb; 71(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 12563098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hormesis in precautionary regulatory culture: models preferences and the advancement of science.
Hanekamp JC; Bast A
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2007 Nov; 26(11):855-73. PubMed ID: 18042580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defining hormesis: comments on Calabrese and Baldwin (2002).
Chapman PM
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2002 Feb; 21(2):99-101; discussion 113-4. PubMed ID: 12102504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A possible path forward for hormesis.
Harrison MC
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2001 Jul; 31(4-5):653-4. PubMed ID: 11504191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Precautionary principle for toxic chemicals - no alternative to safeguard societal benefits.
Jostmann T
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2007 Nov; 26(11):847-9; discussion 875-6. PubMed ID: 18042578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hormesis: policy implications.
Lave LB
J Appl Toxicol; 2000; 20(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 10715612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
