These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11859054)

  • 1. Evaluation of diagnostic procedures.
    Knottnerus JA; van Weel C; Muris JW
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):477-80. PubMed ID: 11859054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy. The STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):1. PubMed ID: 12636041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving standards of medical and public health research.
    Colditz GA
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2002 May; 56(5):333-4. PubMed ID: 11964423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test accuracy and potential sources of bias in diagnostic test evaluation.
    Bell KJ; Macaskill P; Loy C
    Med J Aust; 2020 Jan; 212(1):10-13.e1. PubMed ID: 31851371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chapter 5: assessing risk of bias as a domain of quality in medical test studies.
    Santaguida PL; Riley CM; Matchar DB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-8. PubMed ID: 22648673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of diagnostic methods].
    Doyon F; Hill C
    J Radiol; 2001 Feb; 82(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 11428206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Feb; 36(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12587604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process.
    Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):481-2. PubMed ID: 16477059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of diagnostic tests in the context of evidence-based medicine].
    Trilla A; Aymerich M
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1999; 17 Suppl 2():22-6. PubMed ID: 10605186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to conduct a high-quality systematic review on diagnostic research topics.
    Yao X; Vella E; Brouwers M
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 29549907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnostic studies].
    Felder-Puig R; Mad P; Gartlehner G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2009; 159(13-14):359-66. PubMed ID: 19652944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig L; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC; Kressel HY; Rifai N; Golub RM; Altman DG; Hooft L; Korevaar DA; Cohen JF;
    BMJ; 2015 Oct; 351():h5527. PubMed ID: 26511519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Roaming through methodology. X. The testing of diagnostic procedures].
    Bossuyt PM; Lijmer JG; Mol BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(43):2345-7. PubMed ID: 9864513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grading evidence from test accuracy studies: what makes it challenging compared with the grading of effectiveness studies?
    Rogozińska E; Khan K
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Jun; 22(3):81-84. PubMed ID: 28600330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chapter 7: grading a body of evidence on diagnostic tests.
    Singh S; Chang SM; Matchar DB; Bass EB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S47-55. PubMed ID: 22648675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using evaluations of diagnostic tests: understanding their limitations and making the most of available evidence.
    Deeks JJ
    Ann Oncol; 1999 Jul; 10(7):761-8. PubMed ID: 10470421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews.
    Matchar DB
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jun; 27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-10. PubMed ID: 22648669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.