BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11859303)

  • 21. Magnetic resonance imaging in suspected rectal cancer: determining tumor localization, stage, and sphincter-saving resectability at 3-Tesla-sustained high resolution.
    Winter L; Bruhn H; Langrehr J; Neuhaus P; Felix R; Hänninen LE
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 17453515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?
    Latchamsetty KC; Borden LS; Porter CR; Lacrampe M; Vaughan M; Lin E; Conti N; Wright JL; Corman JM
    Can J Urol; 2007 Feb; 14(1):3429-34. PubMed ID: 17324322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Locoregional staging of prostatic carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in 75 patients treated with radical prostatectomy].
    Gualdi GF; Casciani E; Ferriano MG; Polettini E
    Radiol Med; 1998 May; 95(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 9687928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of MRI with an endorectal coil for staging endometrial cancer.
    Alt CD; Brocker KA; Eichbaum M; Sohn C; Kopp-Schneider A; Kauczor HU; Hallscheidt P
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 22535884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal methods for staging rectal cancer.
    Muthusamy VR; Chang KJ
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Nov; 13(22 Pt 2):6877s-84s. PubMed ID: 18006793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the preoperative staging of rectum cancer].
    Mortensen LA; Leffers AM; Holck S; Bülow S; Achiam M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Aug; 171(35):2476-81. PubMed ID: 19732535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [MRI of extraperitoneal rectal carcinoma].
    Bertini L; Casciani E; Masselli G; Lanciotti S; Polettini E; Gualdi GF
    Ann Ital Chir; 2010; 81(4):239-46; discussion 283. PubMed ID: 21322268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preoperative local staging of rectal cancer with endorectal MR imaging: comparison with histopathologic findings.
    Akin O; Nessar G; Agildere AM; Aydog G
    Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 15531145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. cT3N0 rectal cancer: potential overtreatment with preoperative chemoradiotherapy is warranted.
    Guillem JG; Díaz-González JA; Minsky BD; Valentini V; Jeong SY; Rodriguez-Bigas MA; Coco C; Leon R; Hernandez-Lizoain JL; Aristu JJ; Riedel ER; Nitti D; Wong WD; Pucciarelli S
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 18202411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preoperative 3T MR imaging of rectal cancer: local staging accuracy using a two-dimensional and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence.
    Fütterer JJ; Yakar D; Strijk SP; Barentsz JO
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 18164156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for detection of rectal wall invasion by prostate cancer.
    Leibovici D; Kamat AM; Do KA; Pettaway CA; Ng CS; Evans RB; Rodriguez-Bigas M; Skibber J; Wang X; Pisters LL
    Prostate; 2005 Jan; 62(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 15389800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Correlation of FDG-PET and MRI/CT with histopathology in primary diagnosis, lymph node staging and diagnosis of recurrency of head and neck cancer].
    Pöpperl G; Lang S; Dagdelen O; Jäger L; Tiling R; Hahn K; Tatsch K
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):714-20. PubMed ID: 12063600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer in clinical practice: high accuracy in predicting circumferential margin with clinical benefit.
    Videhult P; Smedh K; Lundin P; Kraaz W
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Jun; 9(5):412-9. PubMed ID: 17504337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [High-resolution magnetic resonance tomography by means of an endorectal coil--the results in rectal tumors].
    Pegios W; Vogl TJ; Hünerbein M; Mack MG; Hintze R; Adler A; Söllner O; Lobeck H; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R
    Rofo; 1996 Feb; 164(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 8679975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in clinically localized prostate cancer: is it accurate?
    Perrotti M; Kaufman RP; Jennings TA; Thaler HT; Soloway SM; Rifkin MD; Fisher HA
    J Urol; 1996 Jul; 156(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 8648768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison between endorectal MRI (EMRTI) and endorectal sonography (ES) after surgery or therapy for rectal tumors to exclude recurrent or residual tumor].
    Pegios W; Hünerbein M; Schröder R; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):731-7. PubMed ID: 12063603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer.
    Torricelli P; Barberini A; Cinquantini F; Sighinolfi M; Cesinaro AM
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1118-25. PubMed ID: 18692752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size?
    Kim JH; Beets GL; Kim MJ; Kessels AG; Beets-Tan RG
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 52(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 15380850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rectal tumor stage: correlation of endorectal MR imaging and pathologic findings.
    Schnall MD; Furth EE; Rosato EF; Kressel HY
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):709-14. PubMed ID: 8115616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.