These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11861731)
1. The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study. Moskal JT; Shen FH; Brown TE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Feb; 84(2):250-5. PubMed ID: 11861731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years. Dearborn JT; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The fate of stable cemented acetabular components retained during revision of a femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty. Berger RA; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Sheinkop MB; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1682-91. PubMed ID: 10608379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study. Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture. Weber M; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Sep; 80(9):1295-305. PubMed ID: 9759814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years. Dearborn JT; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. Clohisy JC; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Sochart DH; Porter ML J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Nov; 79(11):1599-617. PubMed ID: 9384419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bulk structural autogenous grafts and allografts for reconstruction of the acetabulum in total hip arthroplasty. Sixteen-year-average follow-up. Shinar AA; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Feb; 79(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 9052535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty. Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study. Smith SW; Estok DM; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 80(11):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9840632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up. Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study. Clohisy JC; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up. Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old. Schreurs BW; Busch VJ; Welten ML; Verdonschot N; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2385-92. PubMed ID: 15523007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years. Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fate of well fixed cemented femoral components left in place at the time of revision of the acetabular component. Peters CL; Kull L; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 May; 79(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 9160942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty. Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of isolated acetabular revisions: the fate of the unrevised femoral component. Poon ED; Lachiewicz PF J Arthroplasty; 1998 Jan; 13(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 9493537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]