These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11862884)

  • 1. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials.
    Kunzelmann KH; Jelen B; Mehl A; Hickel R
    Int J Comput Dent; 2001 Jul; 4(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 11862884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods.
    Heintze SD; Zellweger G; Cavalleri A; Ferracane J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):166-75. PubMed ID: 16087228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Reimer M
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 8008821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Esthetic restorative materials and opposing enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Marques MM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 18505225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials.
    Ludovichetti FS; Trindade FZ; Werner A; Kleverlaan CJ; Fonseca RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):318.e1-318.e8. PubMed ID: 30097264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Albashaireh ZS; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 19033028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain.
    Clelland NL; Agarwala V; Knobloch LA; Seghi RR
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 14508738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator.
    Mehl C; Scheibner S; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2007 Nov; 23(11):1382-9. PubMed ID: 17210173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
    Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-body wear rate of CAD/CAM resin blocks and their enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Trottmann A; Schmutz F; Roos M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 23684283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 17720238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wear of feldspathic ceramic, nano-filled composite resin and acrylic resin artificial teeth when opposed to different antagonists.
    Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 19049531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.
    Park JH; Park S; Lee K; Yun KD; Lim HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 24199603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of long-term simulated RPD clasp attachment/detachment on retention loss and wear for two clasp types and three abutment material surfaces.
    Helal MA; Baraka OA; Sanad ME; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):370-7. PubMed ID: 22443158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative in vitro wear resistance of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic materials.
    Zhi L; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 26460171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.