These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11863007)

  • 1. Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Trials are underpowered.
    Smith GC
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):483-5. PubMed ID: 11863007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. All unbiased comparative studies should be published.
    Chalmers I
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):483-5. PubMed ID: 11863006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Guidelines highlight gaps in research evidence.
    Thomas J; Paranjothy S; Kelly T; Kavanagh J
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):482-5. PubMed ID: 11859056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Evidence is not as good as NICE suggests.
    Stuart IP
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):484-5. PubMed ID: 11863004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Indications for fetal heart rate monitoring during normal delivery (March 2002)].
    Agence National d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Apr; 32(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 12717310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antenatal cardiotocography (CTG).
    Devane D
    Pract Midwife; 2010 Oct; 13(9):35-6. PubMed ID: 21138138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Intrapartum fetal vitality assessment].
    Rolland de Souza A; Ramos Amorim M
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 18674415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A new monitoring method for safer child delivery. Lower number of metabolic acidosis cases with fetal ECG and cardiotocography].
    Hagberg H; Amer-Wåhlin I; Herbst A; Lilja H; Norén H; Olofsson P; Marsál K
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(48):3875-6, 3878, 3880-1. PubMed ID: 15631221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiotocography v Doppler auscultation. Conclusions do not recognise difference between statistical and clinical significance.
    Grant S
    BMJ; 2002 Feb; 324(7335):483. PubMed ID: 11863005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current methods of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Spencer JA
    Prof Nurse; 1992 Dec; 8(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 1484826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intermittent auscultation for the intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being in Western Australia.
    Gilles MT; Norman M; Dawes V; Gee V; Rouse I; Newnham J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 May; 37(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 9222455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why are we using electronic fetal monitoring?
    Kripke CC
    Am Fam Physician; 1999 May; 59(9):2416, 2421-2. PubMed ID: 10323350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Prevention of perinatal asphyxia. Can more be done by fetal monitoring?].
    Herbst A
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3484-8. PubMed ID: 11037592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Does Doppler blood flow measurement and the fetal actogram proven advantages over the classical fetal monitoring in pregnancy with the aid of cardiotocography? ].
    Heinrich J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(11):721-4. PubMed ID: 2970738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Monitoring labor with cardiotocography and stethoscopic examination in normal and risk deliveries].
    Neldam S; Osler M; Hansen PK; Nim J; Smith SF; Hertel J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1985 Sep; 147(37):2901-7. PubMed ID: 3901456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring, as compared with periodic auscultation, on the neurologic development of premature infants.
    Shy KK; Luthy DA; Bennett FC; Whitfield M; Larson EB; van Belle G; Hughes JP; Wilson JA; Stenchever MA
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Mar; 322(9):588-93. PubMed ID: 2406602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intermittent auscultation for intrapartum fetal heart rate surveillance.
    American College of Nurse Midwives
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2007; 52(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 17467602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Overview of monitoring of foetal cardiac rhythm during a normal birth (March 2002)].
    ANAES
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2003 Apr; 31(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 12866534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Bader TJ; Morgan MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):643; author reply 643-4. PubMed ID: 7898851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.