These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11863029)
1. Womb for rent: Norplant and the undoing of poor women. Vance JL Hastings Constit Law Q; 1994; 21(3):827-55. PubMed ID: 11863029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Norplant use in conjunction with the welfare system. Funk AM South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1993; 2(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 11652714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Norplant bonuses and the unconstitutional conditions doctrine. Coale DS Tex Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 71(1):189-215. PubMed ID: 11656313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The implantation of rights: an argument for unconditionally funded Norplant removal. Arnow RS Berkeley Womens Law J; 1996; 11():19-48. PubMed ID: 11657484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Norplant: the new scarlet letter? Flannery MT J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rights and wrongs of Norplant offers. Berman DA South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1993; 3(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 11652937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception. Mertus J; Heller S St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The constitutionality of the use of the Norplant contraceptive device as a condition of probation. Burke M Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 20(1):207-46. PubMed ID: 11652186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Norplant prescription: birth control, women control, or crime control? Arthur SL UCLA Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 40(1):1-101. PubMed ID: 11652185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Norplant debate: birth control or woman control? Spitz SS Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1993; 25(1):131-69. PubMed ID: 11652335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Privacy and contraception in the American and Irish constitutions. Burt RA St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1988; 7(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 11659154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Unburdening the undue burden standard: orienting Casey in constitutional jurisprudence. Metzger GE Columbia Law Rev; 1994; 94():2025-89. PubMed ID: 11660149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment. Skahn SL Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Constitutional law: denial of state funding of non-therapeutic abortions to indigent women. Harrison TH Stetson Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):247-58. PubMed ID: 11663966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion in the courts: a laywoman's historical guide to the new disaster area. Glen KB Fem Stud; 1978 Feb; 4(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 11665010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion, poverty and the equal protection of the laws. Simson GJ Georgia Law Rev; 1979; 13(2):505-14. PubMed ID: 11664056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Paying for abortion: is the Court wrong? Shinn Re Christ Crisis; 1977 Sep; 37(14):202-7. PubMed ID: 11663787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice. Law S Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion. Hendrickson E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hathaway v. Worcester City Hospital--the right to be sterilized. Olshin L Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 11663627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]