These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11863322)

  • 1. Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.
    Arnell KM; Duncan J
    Cogn Psychol; 2002 Mar; 44(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11863322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period.
    Marti S; Sigman M; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2883-98. PubMed ID: 21988891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal multitasking processing deficits prior to the central bottleneck revealed by event-related potentials.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):3038-53. PubMed ID: 17659310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A psychological refractory period in access to visual short-term memory and the deployment of visual-spatial attention: multitasking processing deficits revealed by event-related potentials.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 17343714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The attentional blink is susceptible to concurrent perceptual processing demands.
    Christmann C; Leuthold H
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):357-77. PubMed ID: 14742180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual route for subtask order control: Evidence from the psychological refractory paradigm.
    Luria R; Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):720-44. PubMed ID: 16707359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Global and local attention in the attentional blink.
    Crewther DP; Lawson ML; Crewther SG
    J Vis; 2007 Dec; 7(14):9.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of interference effects in simultaneous processing of 2 problems].
    Schubert T
    Z Exp Psychol; 1996; 43(4):625-56. PubMed ID: 9206587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intramodal and crossmodal processing delays in the attentional blink paradigm revealed by event-related potentials.
    Ptito A; Arnell K; Jolicoeur P; Macleod J
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):794-803. PubMed ID: 18627533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Queuing network modeling of the psychological refractory period (PRP).
    Wu C; Liu Y
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):913-54. PubMed ID: 18954209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations.
    Hein G; Schubert T
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 15382993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Target consolidation under high temporal processing demands as revealed by MEG.
    Kessler K; Schmitz F; Gross J; Hommel B; Shapiro K; Schnitzler A
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):1030-41. PubMed ID: 15961043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modularity beyond perception: evidence from the PRP paradigm.
    Magen H; Cohen A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):395-414. PubMed ID: 20364926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cued shifts of attention and memory encoding in partial report: a dual-task approach.
    Giesbrecht B; Dixon P; Kingstone A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):695-725. PubMed ID: 11548031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.
    Bock O; Wechsler K; Koch I; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):568-576. PubMed ID: 31776662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. P3 latency shifts in the attentional blink: further evidence for second target processing postponement.
    Sessa P; Luria R; Verleger R; Dell'Acqua R
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1137(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 17258178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semantic and repetition priming within the attentional blink: an event-related brain potential (ERP) investigation study.
    Pesciarelli F; Kutas M; Dell'acqua R; Peressotti F; Job R; Urbach TP
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Sep; 76(1-2):21-30. PubMed ID: 17611011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.