129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11863324)
1. Web manuscript submission and tracking system for peer review. The journal moves with the time.
Schroeder TV; Beard JD
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Feb; 23(2):95-6. PubMed ID: 11863324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review is essential for both print and electronic publications.
Weller AC
MedGenMed; 2001 Nov; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 11965200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal?
Kljaković-Gaspić M; Hren D; Marusić A; Marusić M
Arch Med Res; 2003; 34(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 14602513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital plagiarism--the Web giveth and the Web shall taketh.
Barrie JM; Presti DE
J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(1):E6. PubMed ID: 11720925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixed response to NIH's web journal plan.
Butler D; Wadman M
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):8-9. PubMed ID: 10331377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Agents, intermediaries, and journal licensing.
Turner R
J Med Libr Assoc; 2002 Jan; 90(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 11838450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of peer review.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 1997 Sep; 22(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 9410930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
Squires BP
CMAJ; 1989 Jul; 141(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 2731098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Conventional medical journalism is to stay.
Bhatia RS
J Assoc Physicians India; 2000 May; 48(5):550. PubMed ID: 11273163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Review criteria for research manuscripts.
Bordage G; Caelleigh AS; Steinecke A; Bland CJ; Crandall SJ; McGaghie WC; Pangaro LN; Penn G; Regehr G; Shea JS;
Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):897-978. PubMed ID: 11565558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical problems may preclude realization of this proposal.
Della Mea V
J Med Internet Res; 2000; 2(3):E15. PubMed ID: 11720938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Internet and scientific publishing.
van Mil F
Pharm World Sci; 2003 Dec; 25(6):243. PubMed ID: 14689809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The ideal medical journal in the age of IT].
Nylenna M
Lakartidningen; 2004 Jan; 101(1-2):60-3. PubMed ID: 14763006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial: Are referees a good thing?
Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Nov; 111(9):897-8. PubMed ID: 4423064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow the yellow brick road: preparing a manuscript for submission to a scientific journal.
Rogers LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1099-100. PubMed ID: 12388480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Publishers soldier on despite electronic bugs.
Dalton R
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):264. PubMed ID: 12124587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecule pages live.
Nat Cell Biol; 2004 Jan; 6(1):1. PubMed ID: 14704670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Open access to the scientific journal literature.
Suber P
J Biol; 2002; 1(1):3. PubMed ID: 12144706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comments on the fate of a manuscript after being submitted to a scientific journal].
Vargas Fernández L
Rev Med Chil; 1998 Feb; 126(2):225-6. PubMed ID: 9659761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
