These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11865989)

  • 1. Intensity and energy modulated radiotherapy with proton beams: variables affecting optimal prostate plan.
    Yeboah C; Sandison GA; Chvetsov AV
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):176-89. PubMed ID: 11865989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of intensity-modulated very high energy (50-250 MeV) electron therapy.
    Yeboah C; Sandison GA; Moskvin V
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 47(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 12030556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative treatment planning on localized prostate carcinoma conformal photon- versus proton-based radiotherapy.
    Mock U; Bogner J; Georg D; Auberger T; Pötter R
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Jul; 181(7):448-55. PubMed ID: 15995838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A fourier analysis on the maximum acceptable grid size for discrete proton beam dose calculation.
    Li HS; Romeijn HE; Dempsey JF
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3508-18. PubMed ID: 17022247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity modulated radiation therapy using laser-accelerated protons: a Monte Carlo dosimetric study.
    Fourkal E; Li JS; Xiong W; Nahum A; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Dec; 48(24):3977-4000. PubMed ID: 14727747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
    Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
    Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penalized likelihood fluence optimization with evolutionary components for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.
    Baydush AH; Marks LB; Das SK
    Med Phys; 2004 Aug; 31(8):2335-43. PubMed ID: 15377100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An algorithm for systematic selection of beam directions for IMRT.
    Gaede S; Wong E
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):376-88. PubMed ID: 15000624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potential role of intensity modulated proton beams in prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Cella L; Lomax A; Miralbell R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jan; 49(1):217-23. PubMed ID: 11163518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Pugachev A; Li JG; Boyer AL; Hancock SL; Le QT; Donaldson SS; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jun; 50(2):551-60. PubMed ID: 11380245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions.
    Baumert BG; Norton IA; Lomax AJ; Davis JB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1314-24. PubMed ID: 15519805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduction of IMRT beam complexity through the use of beam modulation penalties in the objective function.
    Matuszak MM; Larsen EW; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):507-20. PubMed ID: 17388168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT.
    Schreibmann E; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2863-70. PubMed ID: 15543796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
    Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of beamlet step-size on IMRT plan quality.
    Zhang G; Jiang Z; Shepard D; Earl M; Yu C
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3448-54. PubMed ID: 16370431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical aspects of inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a radiation treatment planner's perspective.
    Parker W; Patrocinio H
    Can J Urol; 2005 Jun; 12 Suppl 2():48-52. PubMed ID: 16018834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimized treatment planning for prostate cancer comparing IMPT, VHEET and 15 MV IMXT.
    Yeboah C; Sandison GA
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Jul; 47(13):2247-61. PubMed ID: 12164585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.