152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11865998)
1. Comment on "Self-absorption correction for 32P, 198Au, and 188Re stents: dose point kernel calculations versus Monte Carlo".
Janicki C
Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):260-1. PubMed ID: 11865998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-absorption correction for 32P, 198Au and 188Re stents: dose point kernel calculations versus Monte Carlo.
Reynaert N; Häfeli UO
Med Phys; 2001 Sep; 28(9):1883-97. PubMed ID: 11585219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo calculations of dose distributions around 32P and 198Au stents for intravascular brachytherapy.
Reynaert N; Verhaegen F; Taeymans Y; Van Eijkeren M; Thierens H
Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1484-91. PubMed ID: 10501047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation dose from a phosphorous-32 impregnated wire mesh vascular stent.
Janicki C; Duggan DM; Coffey CW; Fischell DR; Fischell TA
Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 9089595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modelling of a 188W/188Re beta line source for coronary brachytherapy by means of EGS4 Monte Carlo simulations.
Clarijs MC; Bos AJ; van Eijk CW; Schaart DR
Phys Med Biol; 2000 May; 45(5):1319-34. PubMed ID: 10843107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo calculation of dose rate distributions around 192Ir wires.
Ballester F; Hernández C; Pérez-Calatayud J; Lliso F
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1221-8. PubMed ID: 9284243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetry characterization of 32P catheter-based vascular brachytherapy source wire.
Mourtada FA; Soares CG; Seltzer SM; Lott SH
Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1770-6. PubMed ID: 10984223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric parameters for three low-energy brachytherapy sources using the Monte Carlo N-particle code.
DeMarco JJ; Hugo G; Solberg TD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 12033560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetry of a W-188/Re-188 beta line source for endovascular brachytherapy.
Häfeli UO; Roberts WK; Meier DS; Ciezki JP; Pauer GJ; Lee EJ; Weinhous MS
Med Phys; 2000 Apr; 27(4):668-75. PubMed ID: 10798688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry of the 198Au source used in interstitial brachytherapy.
Dauffy LS; Braby LA; Berner BM
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1579-88. PubMed ID: 16013717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comment on "Monte Carlo simulation of Cf-252 dose distribution brachytherapy" [Med. Phys. 23, 707-711 (1996)].
Wierzbicki JG; Zamenhof R
Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1319; author reply 1321. PubMed ID: 9284257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of radiation dosimetry in water and in solid phantom materials for I-125 and Pd-103 brachytherapy sources: EGS4 Monte Carlo study.
Luxton G
Med Phys; 1994 May; 21(5):631-41. PubMed ID: 7935197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetry of 192Ir wires for LDR interstitial brachytherapy following the AAPM TG-43 dosimetric formalism.
Karaiskos P; Papagiannis P; Angelopoulos A; Sakelliou L; Baltas D; Sandilos P; Vlachos L
Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 11243338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose rate table for a 32P intravascular brachytherapy source from Monte Carlo calculations.
Bohm TD; Mourtada FA; Das RK
Med Phys; 2001 Aug; 28(8):1770-5. PubMed ID: 11548948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The radial depth-dose distribution of a 188W/188Re beta line source measured with novel, ultra-thin TLDs in a PMMA phantom: comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.
Schaart DR; Bos AJ; Winkelman AJ; Clarijs MC
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Oct; 47(20):3605-27. PubMed ID: 12433123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity of low energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition.
Landry G; Reniers B; Murrer L; Lutgens L; Gurp EB; Pignol JP; Keller B; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5188-98. PubMed ID: 21089752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo calculations of dose rate distributions around the Amersham CDCS-M-type 137Cs source.
Casal E; Ballester F; Lluch JL; Pérez-Calatayud J; Lliso F
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):132-40. PubMed ID: 10659748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose distribution for endovascular brachytherapy using Ir-192 sources: comparison of Monte Carlo calculations with radiochromic film measurements.
Sureka CS; Sunny CS; Subbaiah KV; Aruna P; Ganesan S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(2):525-37. PubMed ID: 17202631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dosimetric comparison of 169Yb versus 192Ir for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Lymperopoulou G; Papagiannis P; Sakelliou L; Milickovic N; Giannouli S; Baltas D
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3832-42. PubMed ID: 16475783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo calculations and experimental measurements of dosimetry parameters of a new 103Pd source.
Li Z; Palta JR; Fan JJ
Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1108-12. PubMed ID: 10841416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
