BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11866272)

  • 21. Can MRCP replace ERCP for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis?
    Kamisawa T; Tu Y; Egawa N; Tsuruta K; Okamoto A; Kodama M; Kamata N
    Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 18437450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Cholangiopancreatography with magnetic resonance in the assessment of pancreatic ducts].
    Pavone P; Panebianco V; Laghi A; Catalano C; Messina A; Lobina L; Pirillo S; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 1997; 94(1-2):61-7. PubMed ID: 9424654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraductal papillary tumors of the pancreas: evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Sugiyama M; Atomi Y; Hachiya J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Feb; 93(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 9468232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?].
    Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic efficacy of non-breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
    Kuo YT; Jaw TS; Wang CK; Lee LW; Shen PC; Liu GC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Feb; 98(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 10083764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the mucin producing pancreatic tumor (MPT)].
    Usuki N; Miyamoto T; Okabe Y
    Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2907-10. PubMed ID: 9847619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pitfalls of MRCP in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction.
    Kamisawa T; Okamoto T
    JOP; 2004 Nov; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 15536287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
    Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
    Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology.
    Mariani A; Arcidiacono PG; Curioni S; Giussani A; Testoni PA
    Dig Liver Dis; 2009 Oct; 41(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 19278909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors].
    Diehl SJ; Lehmann KJ; Gaa J; Meier-Willersen HJ; Wendl K; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10370410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
    Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Magnetic resonance pancreatography.
    Barish M; Soto J; Ferrucci J
    Endoscopy; 1997 Aug; 29(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 9342566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
    Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
    Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography vs Endoscopy Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Detection of Anatomic Variants of the Pancreatic Duct in Children.
    Lin TK; Vitale DS; Abu-El-Haija M; Anton CG; Crotty E; Li Y; Zhang B; Trout AT
    J Pediatr; 2022 May; 244():120-124. PubMed ID: 35065151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.
    Lomas DJ; Bearcroft PW; Gimson AE
    Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1411-7. PubMed ID: 10460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, indications and clinical results].
    Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 1997 Dec; 94(6):632-41. PubMed ID: 9524602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in identifying pancreatic duct disruption.
    Drake LM; Anis M; Lawrence C
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Sep; 46(8):696-9. PubMed ID: 22565603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of cystic tumor of the pancreas compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and computed tomography.
    Mera K; Tajiri H; Muto M; Ohtsu A; Furuse J; Maru Y; Kinoshita T; Ryu M; Nawano S; Murakami K; Moriyama N; Yoshida S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1999 Jun; 29(6):294-8. PubMed ID: 10418558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Single shot fast spin echo sequence MRI cholangiopancreatography].
    Lefèvre F; Crouzet P; Gaucher H; Chapuis F; Béot S; Boccaccini H; Bazin C; Régent D
    J Radiol; 1998 May; 79(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9757270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique.
    Barish MA; Yucel EK; Soto JA; Chuttani R; Ferrucci JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 7618543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.