These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11866352)
1. The effects of normal human variability and hand activity on sensory testing with the full Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments kit. Massy-Westropp N J Hand Ther; 2002; 15(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 11866352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fifty years of somatosensory research: from the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments to the Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test. Weinstein S J Hand Ther; 1993; 6(1):11-22; discussion 50. PubMed ID: 8343870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Brush Allodynia and Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing in the Detection of Allodynia Within Regions of Secondary Hyperalgesia in Humans. Maracle EC; Hung LY; Fell SI; Osmond MR; Brown SH; Srbely JZ Pain Pract; 2017 Jan; 17(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 26936430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Normal values for sensory thresholds in the cervical dermatomes: a critical note on the use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Voerman VF; van Egmond J; Crul BJ Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1999; 78(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 9923425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensory thresholds of normal human feet. Jeng C; Michelson J; Mizel M Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Jun; 21(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 10884110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoral measurement of tactile and filament-prick pain threshold using shortened Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. Komiyama O; Gracely RH; Kawara M; Laat AD Clin J Pain; 2008 Jan; 24(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 18180631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of donor and recipient site sensation in free tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity. Cordeiro PG; Schwartz M; Neves RI; Tuma R Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Nov; 39(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 9374141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and Reliability of Criteria for Plantar Sensation Assessment Using Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament as a Clinically Usable Index. Nakamoto M; Ideguchi N; Iwata S; Tomita S; Morimoto N; Fukuda S; Kudo S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(21):. PubMed ID: 36360967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra- and interobserver reliability of sensibility testing in asymptomatic individuals. Rozental TD; Beredjiklian PK; Guyette TM; Weiland AJ Ann Plast Surg; 2000 Jun; 44(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 10884076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostaglandin E1 in lipid microspheres ameliorates diabetic peripheral neuropathy: clinical usefulness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for evaluating diabetic sensory abnormality. Akahori H; Takamura T; Hayakawa T; Ando H; Yamashita H; Kobayashi K Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2004 Jun; 64(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 15126001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A preliminary study of locognosia in people affected by leprosy. Ebenezer M; Nail K; Pradeepa N Indian J Lepr; 2011; 83(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 22783755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nerve injuries to the volar aspect of the hand: A comparison of the reliability of the Weber static test versus the gauze test. Bijon C; Diaz JJH; Pizza C; Facca S; Pereira A; Liverneaux P Injury; 2017 Nov; 48(11):2582-2585. PubMed ID: 28899560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the semmes-weinstein monofilament 4-2-1 stepping algorithm. Snyder BA; Munter AD; Houston MN; Hoch JM; Hoch MC Muscle Nerve; 2016 Jun; 53(6):918-24. PubMed ID: 26474392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tactile sensitivity thresholds for the radial hemi-pulp of the index: A comparison between the Semmes-Weinstein and Cochet-Bonnet tests in 25 healthy subjects. Grobnicu O; Vinée F; Igeta Y; Xavier F; Bourcier T; Liverneaux P Hand Surg Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 37(5):295-299. PubMed ID: 30078625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of tactile sensitivity measured with a new digital esthesiometer (Beam Test) relative to Semmes-Weinstein monofilament analog esthesiometer. Sapa MC; Sagot JC; Touvenot G; Xavier F; Hidalgo Diaz JJ; Facca S; Zaré M; Liverneaux P Hand Surg Rehabil; 2019 Sep; 38(4):242-245. PubMed ID: 31254656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpretation of cutaneous pressure threshold (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament measurement) following median nerve repair and sensory reeducation in the adult. Imai H; Tajima T; Natsuma Y Microsurgery; 1989; 10(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 2770515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of the Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments to measure coetaneous sensibility in the feet of healthy subjects. Collins S; Visscher P; De Vet HC; Zuurmond WW; Perez RS Disabil Rehabil; 2010; 32(24):2019-27. PubMed ID: 20441434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques. Mofid MM; Dellon AL; Elias JJ; Nahabedian MY Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jun; 109(7):2283-8. PubMed ID: 12045551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments perception Test and sensory nerve conduction studies in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Raji P; Ansari NN; Naghdi S; Forogh B; Hasson S NeuroRehabilitation; 2014; 35(3):543-52. PubMed ID: 25238864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]